Expanding the number of phthalates monitored in house dust

ABSTRACT

Phthalates have been used as plasticisers for several decades in various industry and consumer products. A method was developed for the determination of 13 not commonly monitored phthalates in household dust. The method was based on solvent extraction using sonication, sample clean-up by solid phase extraction (SPE), and analysis using isotope dilution gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS). The method was applied to the analysis of dust samples collected using two vacuum sampling techniques from 38 urban Canadian homes: a sample of fresh or ‘active’ dust (FD) collected by technicians and a composite sample taken from the household vacuum cleaner (HD). Spearman rank correlations between HD and FD samples were significant for six phthalates with median concentrations above their method detection limits (MDLs), suggesting that the HD samples provide comparable results with FD samples. Seven phthalates were detected and quantified in a Canada-wide set of 126 household dust samples, among which six phthalates were detected at frequencies higher than 87%, with median (range) concentrations of 1.9 (<0.42–240) (μg/g) for diisohexyl phthalate (DIHxP), 3.8 (<0.16–260) (μg/g) for di-n-heptyl phthalate (DHepP), 6.6 (<1.1–1170) (μg/g) for diisooctyl phthalate (DIOP), 1.1 (<0.12–390) (μg/g) for di-n-octyl phthalate (DOP), 6.3 (<0.16–430) (μg/g) for dinonyl phthalate (DNP), and 1.8 (<0.18–850) (μg/g) for di-n-decyl phthalate (DDP). High detection frequencies and widely scattered concentration levels of these phthalates in this preliminary set of 126 samples suggested a high variability in potential exposure to phthalates in Canadian homes. NIST SRM 2585 (organic contaminants in house dust) was also analysed; eight phthalates were detected, with concentrations ranging from 6.0 μg/g for DOP to 79 μg/g for DIHxP. The results from SRM 2585 may contribute to the certification of phthalate concentration values in this SRM.

KEYWORDS:

• Phthalates
• indoor dust
• SPE
• GC/MS/MS
• dust sampling
• SRM 2585

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Water and Earth Science Associates Ltd for participant recruitment and vacuum sampling. Thanks go to Christine Levesque for sample preparation and inventory and Dave Gardner for assistance with data analysis, Mikin Patel and Shabana Siddique for internal review of the manuscript. The Canadian House Dust Study (CHDS) and the present study were jointly funded by Health Canada and the Chemicals Management Plan.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The Canadian House Dust Study (CHDS) and the present study were jointly funded by Health Canada and the Chemicals Management Plan.