304
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A simple spectrophotometric method to determine phytic acid in poultry wastewater without acid digestion

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1141-1151 | Received 23 Sep 2019, Accepted 17 Feb 2020, Published online: 02 Mar 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Frequently, wastewater from treatment plants associated with animal husbandry, mainly animal feeding operations, are used to irrigate near agricultural lands based on nitrogen requirements. To avoid soil phosphorus accumulation owing to its long-term application, it is necessary to achieve lower levels of total phosphorus; one of the methods involve eliminating dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) in treatment systems. The DOP in effluents and manure wastewater streams is commonly quantified without the identification of individual phosphorus species. Nevertheless, characterisation of the DOP is particularly important, because removal techniques, as well as soil sorption capacity and phosphorus transfer in the runoff to water bodies, differ for different DOP compounds. Particularly, phytic acid (PA), the main DOP compound in animal wastes, can strongly bind to soils making it unavailable for plant uptake. This work evaluates the application of a simple analytical procedure to the determination of the PA concentration in manure wastewater. The method does not require a prior acid digestion stage; in addition, sample colour removal, as well as the removal of potentially interfering compounds are not required. The results are in agreement with results obtained using 31P NMR. PA recoveries ranged between 87% and 97%, relative standard deviation was <8.5%, while the limits of detection and quantification for phosphorus as PA were 0.18 mg·L−1 and 0.55 mg·L−1 respectively.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Johanna Duarte, Axel Dullak and Fátima Díaz for their invaluable assistance. The excellent technical support from the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Laboratory of Chemical Faculty (UdelaR) is also appreciated.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the CONACYT through PROCIENCIA Program Fund resources for Excellence in Education and Research – FEEI from FONACIDE, Paraguay Projects [14-INV-282 and 14-INV-392]; National Researcher Incentive Program (PRONII); National Agency for Research and Innovation (ANII) [POS_NAC_2014_1_102893].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.