31
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A comparative analysis of pesticides residues in tobacco leaves cultivated in Iran and different parts of the world

, , , &
Received 29 Jan 2024, Accepted 03 Mar 2024, Published online: 07 Mar 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Pesticides are widely used worldwide for agricultural purposes. Exposure to pesticide residues in tobacco products can have negative effects on human health. In the present study, samples of tobacco leaves were collected from five regions of Iran and five countries (imported products) to assess the presence of pesticide residues from the tobacco complex located in Gilan, Iran. The residuals of 57 pesticides were analysed using LC-MS/MS and GC-ECD techniques, employing the QuEChER sample preparation method, which involved acetonitrile extraction followed by dispersed solid phase extraction (d-SPE) utilising primary secondary amine (PSA) and graphitised carbon black (GCB) adsorbents. Validation of the analytical methods was performed based on parameters such as percentage relative standard deviation (RSD), Limits of Detection (LOD), and Limit of Quantification (LOQ). In most of the samples, the pesticides residuals were lower than the Guidance Residue Levels (GRLs) of the Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA). Concerning organophosphorus compounds and carbamates, the Iranian samples exhibited the highest average concentration of the Thiodicarb pesticide (525.2 µg/kg). In imported samples, the highest average residual concentration was observed for the dichlorine pesticide (206.3 μg/kg) across all samples. Among all samples for organochlorine compounds, pesticides p, p’-DDT (381.9 µg/kg), and Cyromazine (94.7 µg/kg) displayed the highest average residue in Iranian and imported samples, respectively. It should be emphasised that despite the prohibition of certain pesticides in agricultural lands, of the remain of these organic compounds can still be detected in tobacco leaves in different parts of the world.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Research and Technology Vice-Chancellor of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences for their financial support (grant number A-11-357-6) and (ethical code IR.ZUMS.REC.1400.338).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Credit authorship contribution statement

ZF contributed to the conception, design, and supervision of the study. NZ and AA performed material preparation, data collection, experiments, analysis, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. GRS conducted the methodology, validation, and formal analysis. AA did conceptualisation, study design, and wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences [A-11-357-6].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.