121
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Comparison of Ultrasonic Extraction and Soxhlet Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Sediments and Air Particulate Material

, , &
Pages 221-230 | Received 28 Jan 1992, Published online: 24 Sep 2006
 

Abstract

The extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from sediments and from an urban dust standard reference material (SRM 1649) was compared using two methods; ultrasonication and Soxhlet extraction. Sample weights ranging from 0.5 g to 5 g were extracted using ultrasonication. The yield of organic material from sediment samples using ultrasonication with two solvents was 2.53 ± 0.10% while the Soxhlet method yielded 2.41 ± 0.14% of the initial sample weight. Sequential ultrasonic extraction with two solvents was much more rapid (45 minutes) than Soxhlet extraction (two days) and resulted in equal extraction efficiency. The levels of PAH extracted by ultrasonication from the urban dust standard reference material varied by no more than 15% from the certified values.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.