ABSTRACT
The literature on critical thinking (CT) in counselling and therapy generally posits higher quality outcomes when CT is applied in therapeutic treatment. We critically examine support for the claim that CT improves clinical outcomes. The purported effects of CT are first identified by arguments in favour of using CT in therapeutic treatment, both in terms of its general efficacy and with regard to its applicability in professional counselling. We then underscore limitations in the current literature, highlighting mainly a gap between theory and practice. Overall, our results suggest that available evidence provides primarily inferential, rather than direct, support for the claim that CT positively influences therapy outcomes. We close the paper by proposing research questions to guide further empirical investigation.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Correction Statement
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Notes
1 Other cognitive skills and dispositions include diligently sustaining cognitive exertion, valuing information, an intrinsic appreciation for learning, thoughtful consideration of the limits of one’s knowledge and the possibility of being wrong, as well as deriving enjoyment from thinking about thinking.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Izaak L. Williams
Izaak L. Williams is a research-practitioner in the counseling field. His interest includes the application of psychological principles to clinical phenomena and philosophical issues. He can be contacted at [email protected]
David E. Wright
David E. Wright is an independent scholar. He has research interests in critical thinking, forgiveness, ethics, and metacognition. He can be contacted at [email protected]