1,022
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The sustainability-to-employment pipeline: the impact of SDG-related curricula on graduates’ employability

, ORCID Icon &
Received 29 Jun 2022, Accepted 20 Dec 2023, Published online: 02 Jan 2024

ABSTRACT

Public and private organizations—including higher education institutions—frequently adopt the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to facilitate a better future. In their efforts to realize the Agenda 2030, universities are focusing on how teaching and curricula shape students’ competencies in interpreting and contributing to current societal challenges. Likewise, with businesses increasingly engaged in sustainable development issues, students will need SDG-related skills to align with current job-market requirements. Here, we examine the relationship between master graduates’ employability and the presence and type of SDGs in their curricula. We run a series of logistic regressions where we use three different model specifications: (i) curriculum with an SDG-related ECTS above the mean, (ii) curriculum related to a specific class of SDG (well-being, environment, economy, governance), and (iii) curriculum related to a specific SDG. Further, we consider three aspects of employability: having a job, job coherence (i.e. the match between a job and one’s field of study), and employment quality (i.e. having a higher salary). For this purpose, we collected data from 5,784 master's graduates at the University of Bologna in 2017. We derived employability measures from 2020 AlmaLaurea data to have a three-year time lag from graduation. Generally, we find that students who attended courses with SDG-related content achieved a higher and better occupation or a better skill match. At a grouped level, we find that SDG categories have a different impact on the students’ working outcomes. For instance, students with more SDG-related ECTS in the economy area have higher odds of being employed, finding a better job-skill match, and getting better salaries. In addition, the single goals were studied by showing the effects on finding work, having a skill match and earning a better salary.

1. Introduction

Universities are pivotal in sustainable development (Figueiró and Raufflet Citation2015; Lozano et al. Citation2013; Swaim et al. Citation2014), prioritizing the implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of their social responsibility (EUA, Citation2018). Also, the Times Higher Education Impact Ranking highlights the growing connection between a university's reputation and its contribution to Agenda 2030 (THE Citation2023). HEIs integrate sustainability into teaching and research, aligning with the 17 SDGs since 2015 (Fia, Ghasemzadeh, and Paletta Citation2022). Emphasis on teaching SDGs enhances students’ sustainability competencies, producing skilled practitioners for SDGs and imparting sustainability lessons to all graduates that they can apply in their future careers (Sánchez-Carracedo et al. Citation2021; THE Citation2023).

Within this context, the concept of employability becomes particularly relevant (Williams et al. Citation2016; Yorke Citation2006). Employability encompasses skills, knowledge, and attitudes essential for navigating and succeeding in modern employment's dynamic and complex landscape (Aragon-Correa et al. Citation2017; Figueiró and Raufflet Citation2015). Without an education system aligned with the SDGs, universities risk producing graduates who are ill-equipped for current challenges, potentially compromising their employability and, by extension, the institutions’ reputations and rankings.

Nevertheless, it has been unclear whether the job market has fully appreciated those competencies. Despite the private sector's undeniable role in the UN 2030 Agenda and support from bodies such as the Global Reporting Initiative (Nonet et al. Citation2022), companies are slowly integrating the SDGs into their sustainability strategies (Mio, Panfilo, and Blundo Citation2020). While there is a consensus on the importance of sustainability skills for employability due to the growing demand for socially responsible practices (Banerjee Citation2011; Winfield and Ndlovu Citation2019). CEOs are prioritizing the ‘sustainability literacy’ (Gordon Citation2021), prompting business schools to integrate sustainability (Amaeshi, Muthuri, and Ogbechie Citation2019). More than 15,000 global companies, including Leonardo, ALDI, Lindt, and Pedius, have committed to the SDGs through the UN Global Compact (UN Citation2022). Recognizing the need to foster SDG-related skills, universities must strengthen their curricula for professionals entering the workforce (Jelonek and Urbaniec Citation2019; Moosmayer et al. Citation2019).

Not surprisingly, different streams of literature addressed the topic from different angles. Several theoretical studies explore and map sustainability competencies required by the job market (Fang and O’Toole Citation2023; Lambrechts and Ceulemans Citation2013; Osagie et al. Citation2016). Other studies explore which pedagogical tools to introduce SDGs-related content into teaching programs (Berchin, de Aguiar Dutra, and de Andrade Guerra Citation2021; Paletta et al. Citation2020). Lastly, a stream of qualitative studies explored the relationship between the sustainability competencies of graduates and the employability (Jelonek and Urbaniec Citation2019; Winfield and Ndlovu Citation2019; Zinkunegi-Goitia and Rekalde-Rodríguez Citation2022). Moreover, graduates’ employability determinants are a consolidated field of study that point toward a crucial role of academic performance, internship, international experience, and socio-economic background.Footnote1 However, the literature on sustainability in HEIs still lacks quantitative research, and the literature on graduate employability determinants lacks considerations on the sustainability content of curricula (Lozano et al. Citation2015). Qualitative studies, effective for exploring complex phenomena and, especially for exploratory research (Eisenhardt Citation1989; Yin Citation2013), face criticism for limited generalizability (Yin Citation2013). A parametric quantitative approach provides more generalizable results, highlighting patterns in the population under study (Bell, Bryman, and Harley Citation2022). The literature has highlighted that the definition of employability remains unclear (Römgens, Scoupe, and Beausaert Citation2020), with some distinguishing between employment and employability. The former refers to having a job, while employability focuses on possessing the necessary skills for job acquisition (Yorke Citation2006). To the extent of this paper, we study employability as a bundle of skills and competencies necessary for finding a job, matching studies to skills, and earning a better salary (Broadley et al. Citation2022; Yorke Citation2006).Footnote2

We used data on 5,784 master graduates from the University of Bologna to study the probability of becoming employed based on the presence and type of SDG-related curricula.Footnote3 We considered three types of SDG-related curricula: (i) curriculum with an SDG-related university educational credits (ECTS) above the mean, (ii) curriculum related to a specific class of SDG, and (iii) curriculum related to a specific SDG. Moreover, we did not limit our analysis solely to graduate employment rate; there are cases where universities might achieve a high employment rate but be less effective at guaranteeing high wages and job quality (Smorenburg and van der Velden Citation1995). For this reason, we also investigated the job quality in terms of wages and educational/skill mismatch.Footnote4

This paper addresses gaps in employability and sustainability literature in higher education. The contribution is twofold. We add evidence based on a hypothetical-deductive model to explore whether graduates with SDGs-related themes in the curricula have more and better employment opportunities (Winfield and Ndlovu Citation2019). We also advance three original measures of a curricula’s SDG-relatedness and study their impact on three employability dimensions. Thus, our paper improves scholarly understanding of whether teaching strategies regarding sustainability relate to employment opportunities.

2. Literature review

The higher education literature on SDGs primarily examined how universities’ policies can support the implementation of SDGs into teaching programs. Policies mainly focus on SDG 4 – ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Goal 4 can be achieved by strengthening the teaching staff’s personal and professional capabilities (Kopnina Citation2018), leveraging digital learning systems (O’Keeffe Citation2020), and creating new university programs that are more just and inclusive (Kester Citation2019). Other studies have focused on the importance of developing evaluation systems that can measure the implementation of SGDs in teaching programs or identified teaching methods and pedagogies that better convey SD education (Paletta and Bonoli Citation2019). These methods range from stakeholders’ involvement (Paletta and Bonoli Citation2019) to interdisciplinary activities and the promotion of holistic approaches to address complex problems (Berchin, de Aguiar Dutra, and de Andrade Guerra Citation2021). Another stream of literature studied the integration of SDGs in teaching activities at a more granular level (UNESCO Citation2017), arguing that teaching programs should deal with not only raising students’ awareness about sustainability (Zermeño and de la Garza Citation2020), but also providing a complete curriculum for achieving the UN SDG targets and indicators (Desha, Rowe, and Hargreaves Citation2019).Footnote5 Moreover, the integration of sustainability in the curricula has roots since the 90s, gaining recognition through the Organizations and the Natural Environment Division of the Academy of Management (Stead and Edward Stead Citation2010). The United Nations’ 2007 introduction of responsible management principles (PRME) prompted higher education institutions to embed sustainability in business courses (Montiel, Gallo, and Antolin-Lopez Citation2020). Recent studies highlight the significance of CSR initiatives involving multinational companies and NGOs in addressing SDGs-related challenges, emphasizing the need to educate workers and managers on sustainability (Chavan, Gowan, and Vogeley Citation2022). A separate stream of literature points toward the key competencies HEIs should ensure students address sustainable development challenges. Future managers and workers require diverse skills, including ethical responsibility, problem-solving, and forward-thinking capacities (Lambrechts and Ceulemans Citation2013; Osagie et al. Citation2016). Fang and O’Toole (Citation2023) contribute students’ perspectives on integrating SDGs into curricula, emphasizing the crucial role of SDG training in acquiring key employability competencies. While significant streams of work on sustainability in HEIs operate either at the level of pedagogies and teaching methods (Cotton et al. Citation2009) or of workers’ and managers’ sustainability competencies for the job market (Rieckmann Citation2012), only a few studies have specifically investigated the relationship between sustainability and employability, particularly concerning introducing SDGs-related themes into the curricula.

For example, Jelonek and Urbaniec (Citation2019) investigated the link between sustainability competencies and employability for higher education graduates in Poland using qualitative methods. Findings showed a market-oriented focus on current job-market needs. Essential skills are communication, proactive attitudes, and leadership. However, other competencies emerged as necessary, which are also compatible with sustainability ones: strategic actions competencies, interpersonal competencies, and system thinking competencies (Jelonek and Urbaniec Citation2019, 5715). The focus group supported the introduction of sustainability competencies, emphasizing their importance in addressing challenges posed by globalization and technological development (Jelonek and Urbaniec Citation2019, 5715). Ali, Murphy, and Nadkarni (Citation2014) investigated the relationship between technology-based learning tools, the acquisition of sustainability competencies, and employability on a sample of UAE, UK, and Swiss hospitality students. Findings from focus groups revealed that only UK students perceived e-learning as positively impacting their employability. Zinkunegi-Goitia and Rekalde-Rodríguez (Citation2022) analyzed the impact on students’ employability competencies by introducing an innovative teaching project to address the challenge of reducing plastic pollution. Based on nine interviews with students of the University of the Basque Country and the University of Bordeaux, the authors found that the project permitted interaction between academia and social agents to develop skills demanded by the job market. Lastly, Winfield and Ndlovu (Citation2019) the impact of embedding sustainability into the curriculum on students’ employability. Focusing on Nottingham Business School, the case study introduced sustainability topics to six modules in 2017. The research found that the new modules enhanced self-awareness and sustainability literacy, contributing to a rise in students’ employability from 71% in 2011/2012 to 89.6% in 2018. While these analyses highlight how the sustainability content in an educational program may foster employability-relevant competencies, qualitative studies limit broad generalization to diverse contexts.

In the literature on traditional employability determinants,Footnote6 the relatedness of curricula to SDGs can be an important factor by preparing students not just for the current job market but for a future workforce that demands agility in sustainable practices and thinking (Winfield and Ndlovu Citation2019). By doing so, HEIs can equip graduates to meet the challenges of tomorrow’s economic, environmental, and social landscapes. The expectation is that graduates who are well-versed in the SDGs will not only find their skills in higher demand but will also command roles that entirely use their unique competencies, thus achieving better employability. The study of Clemente, Giner, and Vélez (Citation2020) represents a first attempt to quantitatively investigate the impact of introducing SDG-related content into graduate curricula on employability. While their study focuses only on SDG4 (quality in education), they show that students achieving SDG4, received higher employer assessments, suggesting a positive contribution to employability and sustainable development through quality higher education.

Thus, given this scenario, we aim to provide novel quantitative empirical evidence on the relationship between the curricula’s orientation toward SDGs – what we labeled the SDGs-relatedness of curricula – and the employability of graduates. Also, we go beyond the understanding of employability as the fact of getting a job to incorporate a broader notion that account for quality in term of salary and the use of acquired competencies.

3. Methodology

3.1. Data source

We focused on the University of Bologna's (UNIBO) pioneering approach to measuring its performance related to the Agenda 2030, showcased at the G7 Environment Ministerial Meeting (Paletta et al. Citation2020). This initiative significantly impacted the planning of teaching and research programs to address the Agenda 2030 (Paletta and Bonoli Citation2019; UNIBO Citation2017).

Our database covers 6,068 master’s degree students who graduated from UNIBO in 2017. We excluded 284 cases that were missing data, producing a final sample of 5,784 students. For each academic year 2016/17 subject, all UNIBO lecturers used their syllabi to indicate how their course related to one or more SDGs, according to the UN format (UNIBO Citation2017). Based on this information, we could determine the number of exams associated with each SDG (see for SDGs’ distribution in each field of study).Footnote7 Also, we included data from the Italian Survey on graduates’ employment status from AlmaLaurea Inter-university Consortium. The data on employability, collected in 2020 for those graduating in 2016/2017, presents a three-year lag. Note that pandemic-induced fluctuations may affected employability. Nevertheless, the general occupational rate in 2020 was 4.9% lower than in 2019 (AlmaLaurea, Citation2021).

Table 1. ECTS sum and average per field of study.

3.2. Model setup

To evaluate the effect of an SDG-related curriculum on employment, salary, and skill mismatch, we adopted the following logit model: Yi=β0+β1SDGj+Tj(β2Marks+β3Regular+β4Internship+β5Working_studies)+Pj(β6Gender+β7FamilyStatus+β8OffSite+β9Age+β10ParentsStudies)+β11FSj.The dependent variable Yi stands for employment status; it is captured by three variables: (Y01) employment, (Y02) higher salary, (Y03) skills mismatch. The independent variable SDGj stands for the SDG-relatedness of a curriculum. The SDG-relatedness variables are based on university educational credits (ECTS):

  • SDG1j is a binary variable that takes the value 1 if the student has accumulated more SDG ECTS than the mean; 0 otherwise.

  • SDG2j groups the SDG ECTS into four categories: Well-Being (SDG:1,3,4,5,10); Governance (SDG:16,17); Economy (SDG:2,6,7,8,9,11,12); Environment (SDG:13,14,15). For each group, we created a binary variable that equals 1 if the total ECTS is above average; 0 otherwise.

  • SDG3j considers the total ECTS for each of the 17 SDGs. Footnote8

The controls ( and ) are: training characteristics T; personal characteristics P; field of study FS.

Table 2. Variables’ description.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics.

4. Results

presents the results of the logistic regressions. The M1 specifications (M1A, M1B, M1C) capture the effect of accumulating SDG-related ECTS over the mean on employment (Y01), skill mismatch (Y02), and salary (Y03). Specifically, students with a curriculum where the SDG-related ECTS exceeded the mean were almost three times more likely to find a job, had an almost 66% higher chance of job-skill match, and were 4.3 times more likely to be better paid than those whose ECTS was less than the average.

Table 4. Logit results in odds ratio.

The M2 specifications (M2A, M2B, M2C) covered the curriculum related to different SDG areas. Students accumulating more than the average SDG-related ECTS for well-being were 16% more likely to find a good skill match but 20% less likely to be better paid. This may be because the well-being SDGs are correlated with the social sciences rather than higher-paying fields (Bol and Heisig Citation2021). Meanwhile, students with SDG-related ECTS above the mean in the economy area were almost four times more likely to be employed, achieve a job-skill match, and earn a better salary. Like before, this finding may stem from the fact that economy-SDGs relate more to fields with better opportunities (Klein Citation2016). A similar pattern emerged for employment and salary for governance, while environment was not statistically significant.

Adopting a demand-side perspective (i.e. relating employability to features of the job market) revealed further insights (Klein Citation2016). For instance, well-being goals provide competencies required by professions dealing with poverty (e.g. managing social or health services for children or the elderly). Organizations in these sectors typically require motivated workers who can tolerate lower salaries (Borzaga and Tortia Citation2006). Meanwhile, economy goals provide competencies for sustainable production and consumption that are increasingly demanded by the job market (Zinkunegi-Goitia and Rekalde-Rodríguez Citation2022). Similarly, governance goals produce competencies that are necessary for generating the institutional conditions that underpin sustainable development.

The M3 specifications (M3A, M3B, M3C) encompassed single SDGs. The results largely reflect the results at the group level, with some exceptions. Generally, the results show that all SDGs significantly affected the three outcomes. Most goals improve the odds of finding work, having a skill match, and earning a better salary. For instance, each ECTS acquired had the following effects: Goal 02 (Zero hunger) increased the odds of gaining employment and slightly improved the odds of a better salary. Goal 07 (Affordable and clean energy) improved the odds of a higher salary by 1.4%. Goal 08 (Decent work and economic growth), significantly impacted all three outcomes, improving the odds of each by 1.2%, 1.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. Goal 09 (Industry, innovation, and infrastructure) produced significant but lower odds for each outcome. Goal 10 (Reduced inequality) improved the odds of each outcome by 1.8%, 2.6% and 4%, respectively. Goal 12 (Responsible consumption and production) significantly improved the odds of a higher salary by 1.7%. For Goal 17 (Partnerships to achieve the Goal) heightened the odds of finding a job by 4.3%. However, other goals demonstrated a negative impact. For instance, for Goal 03 (Good health and well-being), each point of ECTS coincided with lower odds of finding work or earning a higher salary (by 0.2% for both); for Goal 04 (Quality education), the odds of earning a higher salary declined by 0.4%. These results confirm the negative effects of well-being goals. Meanwhile, for Goal 06 (Clean water and sanitation), ECTS lowered the odds of finding a job by 2% and making a higher salary by 3.1%. This result diverges from the other economy-related goals, although the effect is negligible on both outcomes. Lastly, for each ECTS earned, Goal 13 (Climate action) and Goal 15 (Life on land) lowered the odds of having a skill match by 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively. These reflect the weak effects of environment-related goals. Regarding controls, our findings mainly overlap with past studies, barring a few exceptions which are discussed in the supplementary material.

5. Conclusions and future research trajectories

The relationship between SDG-related curricula and employability is critically important for students and universities. Universities are evaluated on their ability to enhance students’ employability (i.e. in terms of their labor market outcomes; Burke, Citation2015) and their contribution to sustainable development (Lozano et al. Citation2013; Swaim et al. Citation2014). However, scholars under-investigated the relationship between employability and universities’ teaching strategies concerning Agenda 2030.

This paper fills that gap by empirically evaluating the impact of graduates’ curricula (and SDG-relatedness, in particular) on employability in terms of finding a job, matching studies to skills, and earning a better salary. UNIBO serves as an exemplary case, adopting UN Agenda 2030, enhancing sustainable development. Results confirm universities equip students with the competencies improving employability prospects.(Römgens, Scoupe, and Beausaert Citation2020). Corroborating the current literature, our results confirm that students’ employability increases almost three-fold when SDGs are embedded into their curricula (Winfield and Ndlovu Citation2019). This effect is only statistically significant for SDGs related to the economy and governance. Indeed, this also relates to the fields of study effect, which influences the students’ self-perception of employability (Donald, Ashleigh, and Baruch Citation2018).

Moreover, and in support of the extant qualitative literature, we found that the SDG-relatedness of the curriculum positively increases the odds of finding work that matches one’s studies suggesting the value of sustainability competencies (Lambrechts and Ceulemans Citation2013; Osagie et al. Citation2016). Using a quantitative approach substantially enriches the existing literature by providing empirical evidence and statistical verification of the relationship between SDG-oriented curricula and students’ employability. It allowed us to discern the differential effects of various SDGs on employability, reaching a level of generalization that is challenging to achieve with qualitative methods. The consequent insights augment the theoretical debate, lending a deeper understanding of the mechanisms at play in the SDGs-employability relationship.

Lastly, we observed that a higher level of SDGs in the curriculum positively and significantly impacts one’s likelihood of earning a better salary. This result aligns with evidence that pre-work formal education correlates positively with salary (Xiao Citation2002). Notably, we discovered that some SDGs improve this relation. In contrast, others (such as well-being goals) are detrimental—perhaps because, as the extant literature suggests, some fields (such as education) offer fewer high-salary opportunities (Bol and Heisig Citation2021). Finally, this paper advances three original measures of a curricula’s SDG-relatedness, which can be adopted as starting point in future research.

Our results are relevant for policymakers, business leaders, academic administrators, and students in general. For instance, academic administrators might consider conducting periodic reviews of current curricula to assess the extent of SDG integration. Where there are gaps, faculties should be encouraged to embed relevant SDGs more deeply into their courses, especially focusing on those SDGs that have shown a significant relationship with employability outcomes.

Our findings suggest that expanding students’ sustainability literacy may also positively impact the culture that permeates businesses, encouraging leaders’ interests in the sustainable development (Arruda Filho, Hino, and Beuter Citation2019). However, the sustainability content cannot be driven only by an employer-led demand for sustainability competencies (Fang and O’Toole Citation2023). Moreover, current literature highlights that students don’t actively require SDGs-related content in their curricula (Leal Filho, Salvia, and Eustachio Citation2023), while our findings provide evidence about employability which may support students in being more proactive toward SDGs and also promote future initiatives. The results are essential for higher education administrators, which also may incentivize the adoption of new teaching methods and pedagogies to convey sustainability competencies better.

Our work features some notable limitations that could open avenues for future research. For instance, our study only assessed whether sustainability topics were present in specific courses. Future research could explore how courses conceptualize sustainability at the micro-level (see Sánchez-Carracedo et al. Citation2021). However, given that HEIs impart not only technical knowledge but also ‘generic graduate attributes’ (e.g. problem-solving, teamwork, etc.) (Barrie Citation2007; Denson and Zhang Citation2010), it is worth exploring whether sustainability operates more at the level of ‘generic attribute’ or specific knowledge. In this vein, further analysis could also explore pedagogical considerations, including the importance of emotional engagement in learning (Shrivastava, Citation2010). Scholars could also deepen our results regarding the effectiveness of different teaching techniques about sustainability, e.g. students’ active participation (Juárez-Nájera, Dieleman, and Turpin-Marion Citation2006), experience-learning characteristics (Steiner and Posch Citation2006), or interdisciplinary approaches (Kurland et al. Citation2010).

Moreover, we do not investigate the barriers and drivers of introducing SDG themes into teaching programs, which could serve as mediating factors in developing employability-relevant skills (Chang and Lien Citation2020; Weiss et al. Citation2021). Additionally, future investigations should consider the effects of SDGs on a longer time scale (3–10 years after graduation) to captures effects related to the university and career path. In addition, hypothetical-deductive models uncover relationships and test propositions, but qualitative methods, like single or comparative case studies (Eisenhardt Citation1989; Yin Citation2013), are valuable for further exploring processes and meanings between variables (Gephart Citation2004). For example, scholars could conduct in-depth interviews on both the demand and supply side to add nuance to our understanding of courses’ impact and changes in employers’ needs. Similarly, researchers can conduct interviews on graduates’ perspectives to understand how SDGs-related curricula may affect employability.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (48.6 KB)

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 This paper centers on the link between employability and sustainability competences. But, recognizing the traditional employability literature's importance, its discussion and findings are in supplementary material for those seeking a broader context.

2 See supplementary material for a broader discussion on the topic.

3 Note that we analyzed the relationship between SDGs-relatedness of curricula and employability, which refers to the relatedness of teaching programs with SDGs-themes or in other words to the presence of courses with SDGs-related content (see Section 3 for details).

4 Educational/skill mismatch is the lack of coherence between the education provided by the university and the one required by the job (among others (Wiers-Jenssen and Try Citation2005).

5 Note that sustainability education is not a new topic: In 2002, the UN established the Education for Sustainable Development to equip people with the sustainability competencies to address the multiple challenges (Cotton et al. Citation2009). In this context, universities play a major role in imbuing future workers and managers with the competencies and values of responsible behavior (Escudero, Citation2006).

6 See the supplementary material for a discussion of that literature, including its connection with SDGs.

7 In cases where an exam covers content related to two SDGs, full ECTS recognition will be granted for each respective theme. This acknowledges and rewards a comprehensive understanding of competencies in multiple sustainability dimensions.

8 See https://sdgs.un.org/goals for the list of goals.

References

  • Ali, Alisha, Hilary Catherine Murphy, and Sanjay Nadkarni. 2014. “Hospitality Students’ Perceptions of Digital Tools for Learning and Sustainable Development.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 15 (July): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.02.001.
  • AlmaLaurea. 2021. XXIII Rapporto AlmaLaurea, sul Profilo e sulla Condizione Occupazionale dei laureati.
  • Amaeshi, Kenneth, Judy N. Muthuri, and Chris Ogbechie. 2019. Incorporating Sustainability in Management Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto, Alfred A. Marcus, Jorge E. Rivera, and Amy L. Kenworthy. 2017. “Sustainability Management Teaching Resources and the Challenge of Balancing Planet, People, and Profits.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 16 (3): 469–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0180.
  • Arruda Filho, Norman de Paula, Marcia Cassitas Hino, and Barbara Sueli Przybylowicz Beuter. 2019. Including SDGs in the Education of Globally Responsible Leaders. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 20 (5): 856–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2019-0032.
  • Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby. 2011. “Embedding Sustainability across the Organization: A Critical Perspective.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10 (4): 719–31. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0005.
  • Barrie, Simon C. 2007. “A Conceptual Framework for the Teaching and Learning of Generic Graduate Attributes.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 439–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476100.
  • Bell, Emma, Alan Bryman, and Bill Harley. 2022. Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Berchin, Issa Ibrahim, Ana Regina de Aguiar Dutra, and José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra. 2021. “How Do Higher Education Institutions Promote Sustainable Development? A Literature Review.” Sustainable Development 29 (6): 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2219.
  • Bol, Thijs, and Jan Paul Heisig. 2021. “Explaining Wage Differentials by Field of Study among Higher Education Graduates: Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey of Adult Skills.” Social Science Research 99 (September): 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102594.
  • Borzaga, Carlo, and Ermanno Tortia. 2006. “Worker Motivations, Job Satisfaction, and Loyalty in Public and Nonprofit Social Services.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35 (2): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006287207.
  • Broadley, Tania, Yuzhuo Cai, Firth Miriam, Hunt Emma, and Neugebauer John. 2022. The SAGE Handbook of Graduate Employability. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Burke, Ciaran. 2015. Culture, Capitals and Graduate Futures: Degrees of Class. London: Routledge.
  • Chang, Ya-Ching, and Hsing-Lung Lien. 2020. “Mapping Course Sustainability by Embedding the SDGs Inventory into the University Curriculum: A Case Study from National University of Kaohsiung in Taiwan.” Sustainability 12 (10): 4274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104274.
  • Chavan, Meena, Sunaina Gowan, and Joanna Vogeley. 2022. “Collaborative Corporate Social Responsibility Praxis: Case Studies from India.” Social Responsibility Journal 19 (2): 229–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2021-0216.
  • Clemente, Ismael M., Gabriela R. Giner, and Gisela Vélez. 2020. “Towards Sustainability in University Education. Improving University Graduates Chances of Employability by Participation in a High Achievement Academic Program.” Sustainability 12 (2): 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020680.
  • Cotton, Debby, Ian Bailey, Martyn Warren, and Susie Bissell. 2009. “Revolutions and Second-best Solutions: Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 719–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802641552.
  • Denson, Nida, and Shirley Zhang. 2010. “The Impact of Student Experiences with Diversity on Developing Graduate Attributes.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (5): 529–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903222658.
  • Desha, Cheryl, Debra Rowe, and Doug Hargreaves. 2019. “A Review of Progress and Opportunities to Foster Development of Sustainability-Related Competencies in Engineering Education.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 24 (2): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2019.1696652.
  • Donald, William E., Melanie J. Ashleigh, and Yehuda Baruch. 2018. “Students’ Perceptions of Education and Employability: Facilitating Career Transition from Higher Education into the Labor Market.” Career Development International 23 (5): 513–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2017-0171.
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
  • Emanuel, Richard, and J. N. Adams. 2011. “College Students’ Perceptions of Campus Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 12 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111098320.
  • Escudero, M. 2006. Global corporate citizenship and academia: A global convergence. Concept Paper. New York: United Nations.
  • EUA. 2018. Universities and sustainable development towards the global goals. Geneva, Switzerland: European University Association.
  • Fang, Jim, and Jacqueline O’Toole. 2023. “Embedding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in an Undergraduate Business Capstone Subject Using an Experiential Learning Approach: A Qualitative Analysis.” The International Journal of Management Education 21 (1): 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100749.
  • Fia, Magalì, Khat Ghasemzadeh, and Angelo Paletta. 2022. “How Higher Education Institutions Walk Their Talk on the 2030 Agenda: A Systematic Literature Review.” Higher Education Policy 36 (3): 599–63.
  • Figueiró, P. S., and E. Raufflet. 2015. “Sustainability in Higher Education: A Systematic Review with Focus on Management Education.” Journal of Cleaner Production 106: 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118
  • Gephart, Robert P. 2004. “Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (4): 454–62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2004.14438580.
  • Gordon, Cindy. 2021. Why Do Board Directors and CEO’s Need to Value Sustainability and AI Relevance? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2021/05/31/why-do-board-directors-and-ceos-need-to-value-sustainability-and-ai-relevance/.
  • Jelonek, Magdalena, and Maria Urbaniec. 2019. “Development of Sustainability Competencies for the Labour Market: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.” Sustainability 11 (20): 5716. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205716.
  • Juárez-Nájera, Margarita, Hans Dieleman, and Sylvie Turpin-Marion. 2006. “Sustainability in Mexican Higher Education: Towards a New Academic and Professional Culture.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability in Higher Education: What is Happening? 14 (9): 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.049.
  • Kester, Kevin. 2019. “Whiteness, Patriarchy, and Peacebuilding in UN Higher Education: Some Theoretical and Pedagogical Implications from One Case Institution.” Irish Educational Studies 38 (4): 481–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1645722.
  • Klein, Markus. 2016. “The Association between Graduates’ Field of Study and Occupational Attainment in West Germany, 1980–2008.” Journal for Labour Market Research 49 (1): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0201-5.
  • Kopnina, Helen. 2018. “Teaching Sustainable Development Goals in The Netherlands: A Critical Approach.” Environmental Education Research 24 (9): 1268–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1303819.
  • Kurland, Nancy B., Kristy E. H. Michaud, Mechelle Best, Erica Wohldmann, Helen Cox, Kyriakos Pontikis, and Ashwani Vasishth. 2010. “Overcoming Silos: The Role of an Interdisciplinary Course in Shaping a Sustainability Network.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9 (3): 457–76. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.3.zqr457.
  • Lambrechts, Wim, and Kim Ceulemans. 2013. “Sustainability Assessment in Higher Education: Evaluating the Use of the Auditing Instrument for Sustainability in Higher Education (AISHE) in Belgium.” In Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions: Mapping Trends and Good Practices Around the World, edited by Sandra Caeiro, Walter Leal Filho, Charbel Jabbour, and Ulisses M. Azeiteiro, 157–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Leal Filho, Walter, Amanda Lange Salvia, and João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio. 2023. ““An Overview of the Engagement of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals”.” Journal of Cleaner Production 386 (February): 135694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135694.
  • Lozano, Rodrigo, Kim Ceulemans, Mar Alonso-Almeida, Donald Huisingh, Francisco J. Lozano, Tom Waas, Wim Lambrechts, Rebeka Lukman, and Jean Hugé. 2015. “A Review of Commitment and Implementation of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Results from a Worldwide Survey.” Journal of Cleaner Production 108 (December): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048.
  • Lozano, Rodrigo, Rebeka Lukman, Francisco J. Lozano, Donald Huisingh, and Wim Lambrechts. 2013. ““Declarations for Sustainability in Higher Education: Becoming Better Leaders, through Addressing the University System.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities (EMSU) 48 (June): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006.
  • Mio, Chiara, Silvia Panfilo, and Benedetta Blundo. 2020. “Sustainable Development Goals and the Strategic Role of Business: A Systematic Literature Review.” Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (8): 3220–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2568.
  • Montiel, Ivan, Peter Jack Gallo, and Raquel Antolin-Lopez. 2020. “What on Earth Should Managers Learn About Corporate Sustainability? A Threshold Concept Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics 162 (4): 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04361-y.
  • Moosmayer, Dirk C., Sandra Waddock, Long Wang, Matthias P. Hühn, Claus Dierksmeier, and Christopher Gohl. 2019. “Leaving the Road to Abilene: A Pragmatic Approach to Addressing the Normative Paradox of Responsible Management Education.” Journal of Business Ethics 157 (4): 913–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3961-8.
  • Nonet, G. Abord-Hugon, T. Gössling, R. Van Tulder, and J. M. Bryson. 2022. “Multi-Stakeholder Engagement for the Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Business Ethics 180 (4): 945–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05192-0.
  • O’Keeffe, Paul. 2020. “The Case for Engaging Online Tutors for Supporting Learners in Higher Education in Refugee Contexts.” Research in Learning Technology 28:2428. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2428.
  • Osagie, E. R., R. Wesselink, V. Blok, T. Lans, and M. Mulder. 2016. “Individual Competencies for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature and Practice Perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics 135 (2): 233–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2469-0.
  • Paletta, Angelo, and Alessandra Bonoli. 2019. “Governing the University in the Perspective of the United Nations 2030 Agenda: The Case of the University of Bologna.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 20 (3): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0083.
  • Paletta, Angelo, Pietro Fochi, Tullia Gallina Toschi, and Francesco Ubertini. 2020. “Adoption of the SDGs as a Reporting Framework at the Alma Mater Studiorum (University of Bologna) in Italy.” In Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education, edited by Godwell Nhamo, and Vuyo Mjimba, 185–197. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Rieckmann, Marco. 2012. “Future-Oriented Higher Education: Which Key Competencies Should Be Fostered through University Teaching and Learning?” Futures, Special Issue: University Learning 44 (2): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005.
  • Römgens, Inge, Rémi Scoupe, and Simon Beausaert. 2020. “Unraveling the Concept of Employability, Bringing Together Research on Employability in Higher Education and the Workplace.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (12): 2588–2603. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623770.
  • Sánchez-Carracedo, Fermín, Jorge Ruiz-Morales, Rocío Valderrama-Hernández, José Manuel Muñoz-Rodríguez, and Antonio Gomera. 2021. “Analysis of the Presence of Sustainability in Higher Education Degrees of the Spanish University System.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (2): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630811.
  • Shrivastava, P. 2010. “Pedagogy of passion for sustainability.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 9 (3): 443–455.
  • Smorenburg, M. S. M., and R. K. W. van der Velden. 1995. The Labour Market Positions of Types of Education. Dimensions and Stability. Maastricht: ROA.
  • Stead, Jean Garner, and W. Edward Stead. 2010. “Sustainability Comes to Management Education and Research: A Story of Coevolution.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9 (3): 488–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.3.zqr488.
  • Steiner, Gerald, and Alfred Posch. 2006. “Higher Education for Sustainability by Means of Transdisciplinary Case Studies: An Innovative Approach for Solving Complex, Real-World Problems.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability in Higher Education: What is Happening? 14 (9): 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.054.
  • Swaim, James A., Michael J. Maloni, Stuart A. Napshin, and Amy B. Henley. 2014. “Influences on Student Intention and Behavior toward Environmental Sustainability.” Journal of Business Ethics 124 (3): 465–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1883-z.
  • THE. 2023. “Impact Ranking.” Times Higher Education (THE). May 11, 2023. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings.
  • UN. 2022. “UN Global Compact.” Accessed on December 2022. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/interactive.
  • UNESCO. 2017. “Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Goals.” http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf.
  • UNIBO. 2017. “Reporting on U.N. Sustainable-Development Goals 2017.” Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna. https://www.unibo.it/it/allegati/reporting-on-united-nations-sustainable-development-goals-in-inglese-anno-2017/@@download/file/Reporting-United-Nations-Sustainable-Development-Goals%20.pdf.
  • Weiss, Marie, Matthias Barth, Arnim Wiek, and Henrik von Wehrden. 2021. “Drivers and Barriers of Implementing Sustainability Curricula in Higher Education - Assumptions and Evidence.” Higher Education Studies 11 (2): 42–64. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n2p42
  • Wiers-Jenssen, Jannecke, and Sverre Try. 2005. “Labour Market Outcomes of Higher Education Undertaken Abroad.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (6): 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340028.
  • Williams, Stella, Lorna J. Dodd, Catherine Steele, and Raymond Randall. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Current Understandings of Employability.” Journal of Education and Work 29 (8): 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1102210.
  • Winfield, Fiona, and Tabani Ndlovu. 2019. “‘Future-Proof Your Degree’: Embedding Sustainability and Employability at Nottingham Business School (NBS).” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 20 (8): 1329–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0196.
  • Xiao, Jin. 2002. “Determinants of Salary Growth in Shenzhen, China: An Analysis of Formal Education, on-the-Job Training, and Adult Education with a Three-Level Model.” Economics of Education Review 21 (6): 557–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00049-8.
  • Yin, Robert K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Yorke, Mantz. 2006. “Employability in Higher Education: What It Is, What It Is Not | VOCEDplus, the International Tertiary Education and Research Database”. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:16446.
  • Zermeño, Marcela Georgina Gómez, and Lorena Yadira Alemán de la Garza. 2020. “Open Laboratories for Social Innovation: A Strategy for Research and Innovation in Education for Peace and Sustainable developmentSustainable Development is an Issue of High Relevance for All Countries, and Universities Play a Fundamental Role in Promotin.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 22 (2): 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0186.
  • Zinkunegi-Goitia, Olatz, and Itziar Rekalde-Rodríguez. 2022. “Employability within an Education for Sustainability Framework: The Ocean I3 Case Study.” Education Sciences 12 (4): 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040277.