Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study

ABSTRACT

Walking has been highlighted as an independent transportation mode as well as an access/egress mode to/from public transit to encourage the use of more sustainable transport systems. However, walking does not seem to have priority over other transportation modes, especially in areas where various modes of movement are in conflict. The pedestrian push-button system seems to be a solution to distribute the right of way. The focus of this study is on the performance issue of the pedestrian push-button. Specifically, this study deals with issues related to mid-block crossings and attempts to answer two questions: whose waiting time is longer at pre-timed and push-button crossings, pedestrians, or vehicles? and which system – pre-timed or push-button – is better in terms of total waiting time? According to our simulation analyses, if the pedestrian flow rate is less than 120, 85, and 70 ped/h for two-, three-, and four-lane roads, respectively, the push-button system is recommended.

KEYWORDS:

• Pedestrian
• vehicle conflicts
• mid-block crossing
• push-button system
• pre-timed system
• delay
• flow rate

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-201400000001169-N ).