Dynamic finite element simulation of dental prostheses during chewing using muscle equivalent force and trajectory approaches

Abstract

The long-term application of dental prostheses inside the bone has a narrow relation to its biomechanical performance. Chewing is the most complicated function of a dental implant as it implements different forces to the implant at various directions. Therefore, a suitable holistic modelling of the jaw bone, implant, food, muscles, and their forces would be deemed significant to figure out the durability as well as functionality of a dental implant while chewing. So far, two approaches have been proposed to employ the muscle forces into the Finite Element (FE) models, i.e. Muscle Equivalent Force (MEF) and trajectory. This study aimed at propounding a new three-dimensional dynamic FE model based on two muscle forces modelling approaches in order to investigate the stresses and deformations in the dental prosthesis as well as maxillary bone during the time of chewing a cornflakes bio. The results revealed that both contact and the maximum von Mises stress in the implant and bones for trajectory approach considerably exceed those of the MEF. The maximum stresses, moreover, are located around the neck of implant which should be both clinically and structurally strong enough to functionally maintain the bone-implant interface. In addition, a higher displacement due to compressive load is observed for the implant head in trajectory approach. The results suggest the benefits provided by trajectory approach since MEF approach would significantly underestimate the stresses and deformations in both the dental prosthesis and bones.

Keywords:

• Dynamic finite element
• maxillary bone
• dental prosthesis
• muscle equivalent force approach
• trajectory approach

Ethical issues

The use of experimental on the human was approved by the committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This study was also entirely adhered to the declaration of the Helsinki in 2008.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.