Quantification of error between the heartbeat intervals measured form photoplethysmogram and electrocardiogram by synchronisation

Abstract

Currently, heartbeat intervals required for the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) are derived from electrocardiogram (ECG). Many investigators have explored the possibility of using photoplethysmography (PPG), for the analysis of HRV. However, all these studies are based on statistical approach and have used the correlation coefficient for the comparison of HRV data obtained using ECG and PPG, which is inappropriate as the causal relationship between the R-peaks in ECG and the systolic peaks in PPG is well known in physiology. In this study, the heart beat intervals measured from PPG, are compared, beat by beat, with the corresponding beat intervals of same cardiac cycle obtained from the synchronously recorded ECG and the differences between them are taken as errors. These errors are verified to exactly match with the variations in the pulse transit times (PTTs), beat by beat. The error in the measurement of heartbeat intervals using PPG is quantified by obtaining the root mean square of the errors associated with each beat interval for a subject. The rms error, which is found to vary between 0.17 and 1.81% across the study group of 42 subjects, can be treated as insignificant, considering the nonstationary character of physiological signals. The errors are compared and interpreted with the variations in PTT. In view of these findings, PPG can be considered as a low cost, safe and more convenient alternative to ECG, as a wearable sensor outside hospital environment, for the analysis of HRV, without compromising on accuracy.

Keywords:

• Photoplethysmogram
• electrocardiogram
• heart rate variability
• R–R intervals
• rms error

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.