Abstract
This pilot study compares the effect on walking speed, in eight subjects with neuromuscular conditions, of wearing Ligaflex ankle-foot orthoses (AFO), Leafspring orthoses and shoes or with shoes alone. Range of motion, muscle strength and sensation were tested in the lower leg. Subjects underwent a standardized timed 10-m walking test five times in each of the orthoses and shoes as a measure of gait efficiency. A self-administered questionnaire was used to seek the subjects' perceptions of their functional difficulties and their opinions about the relative comfort and stability of these orthoses. Subjects had reduced ranges and strength of dorsiflexion and eversion. Some had proprioceptive deficiencies. Mean walking speed was 0.99 m/s (Leafspring) and 1.1 m/s (Ligaflex or shoes) compared to about 1.3 m/s for a normal population. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that subjects were significantly slower in Leafspring compared to Ligaflex or to shoes. Questionnaire results rated the Leafspring as least comfortable and the Ligaflex most stable. Providing stability may be more important than assisting foot clearance when weakness is restricted to distal muscles. Further research is required to evaluate the comfort and effectiveness of orthoses to compensate for ankle instability in people with neuromuscular conditions.