Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B
Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes
Volume 51, 2016 - Issue 9
543
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Concentration and dissipation of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam residues in maize straw, maize, and soil

, , &
Pages 594-601 | Received 10 Dec 2015, Published online: 18 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

To study the dissipation rates and final residual levels of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in maize straw, maize, and soil, two independent field trials were conducted during the 2014 cropping season in Beijing and Anhui Provinces of China. A 40% wettable powder (20% chlorantraniliprole + 20% thiamethoxam) was sprayed onto maize straw and soil at an application rate of 118 g of active ingredient per hectare (g a.i.ha−1). The residual concentrations were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The chlorantraniliprole half-lives in maize straw and soil were 9.0–10.8 and 9.5–21.7 days, respectively. The thiamethoxam half-lives in maize straw and soil were 8.4–9.8 and 4.3–11.7 days, respectively. The final residues of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam in maize straw, maize, and soil were measured after the pesticides had been sprayed two and three times with an interval of 7 days using 1 and 1.5 times the recommended rate (72 g a.i. ha−1 and 108 g a.i. ha−1, respectively). Representative maize straw, maize, and soil samples were collected after the last treatment at pre-harvest intervals of 7, 14, and 28 days. The chlorantraniliprole residue was below 0.01 mg kg−1 in maize, between 0.01 and 0.31 mg kg−1 in maize straw, and between 0.03 and 1.91 mg kg−1 in soil. The thiamethoxam residue concentrations in maize, maize straw, and soil were <0.01, <0.01, and 0.01–0.03 mg kg−1, respectively. The final pesticide residues on maize were lower than the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.02 mg kg−1 after a 14-day pre-harvest interval. Therefore, a dosage of 72 g a.i. ha−1 was recommended, as it can be considered safe to human beings and animals.

Funding

The work was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (No. 201303027) and the Youth Research Foundation of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science (No. QNJJ201210).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 711.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.