162
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Possible selves of older adults entering a life plan community

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 201-213 | Published online: 17 Apr 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This study examined the possible selves, goals, and perceptions of “time left” of older adults soon after they entered a life plan community as independent living residents. There has been little research regarding the effect of this life transition on older adults’ self-concept, hopes, and fears. Eighteen residents participated in one-hour personal interviews about their reasons for moving, their possible selves, goals, and perception of time left. Time left was measured in two ways: residents were asked to estimate the number of years they had left and were also asked to mark, on a novel visual analogue measure, how “limited” or “expanded” their time left felt to them. Residents were found to have an average of 6.18 possible selves in total, with more hoped-for possible selves (m = 4.39) than feared possible selves (m = 1.78). The majority of the goals were maintenance goals, followed by self-improvement goals and then avoidance goals. Residents estimated that they would live for 11.64 more years, and the majority reported that this felt like “a lot of time.” Based on their responses to the novel visual analogue measure of time left, two-thirds of the participants reported that their time left felt “expanded” rather than “limited.” Consistent with predictions based on socioemotional selectivity theory, participants with longer subjective life expectancies reported more self-improvement goals and more hoped-for selves. Participants identified more possible selves than documented in previous studies, including almost twice as many hoped-for possible selves.

Acknowledgments

This project was presented at the American Psychological Association (APA) Annual Convention in August 2016 and the abstract was printed in the convention program guide. The conference organizers were not granted a license to the work. The authors retain all rights to the work.

Disclosure statement

The first two authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. The third author is the Senior Vice President of Health and Wellness at the Life Plan Community where the study took place. However, she did not have access to study data or materials at any point during the study nor was she involved in analyzing the results.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Regional Institute on Aging [no grant number]. Wichita State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) Number: 3537

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 172.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.