Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 37, 2011 - Issue 4
594
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Avoiding Threat in Late Adulthood: Testing Two Life Span Theories of Emotion

Pages 449-472 | Received 30 Apr 2009, Accepted 14 Feb 2010, Published online: 29 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to explore the time course of age-related attentional biases and the role of emotion regulation as a potential mediator of older adults' performance in an emotion dot probe task. In two studies, younger and older adults (N = 80) completed a visual probe detection task, which presented happy, angry, and sad facial expressions. Across both studies, age influenced attentional responses to angry faces. Results indicated a bias away from angry-related facial emotion information occurring relatively late in attention. Age effects were not attributable to decreasing information processing speed or visuoperceptual function. Current results demonstrated that an age-related attentional preference away from angry facial cues was mediated by efforts to suppress emotion. Findings are discussed in relation to current theories of sociocognitive aging.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the College of Life Sciences and Medicine of University of Aberdeen. The author would like to thank those who kindly volunteered to participate in the study. The author greatly acknowledges the contribution of two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments in an earlier version of the manuscript.

Notes

Note. NART = National Adult Reading Test (Nelson, Citation1982); DSST = Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Wechsler, Citation1981); BFRT = Benton Facial Recognition Test (Benton et al., Citation1983).

Note. For trial type: Same = probe in same location as emotional face; Different = probe in different position to emotional face. Standard deviations are shown in parentheses.

1Note that since the original proposal of testing for mediation by Baron and Kenny (Citation1986), more recent work by Sobel (Citation1990) and MacKinnon (Citation1994) have emphasized the importance of using a statistical test for the mediation path. The Sobel test was used in order to test the hypothesis that the mediation pathway is not equal to zero (for details see Dudley, Benuzillo, & Carrico, Citation2004).

Note. PR-Test = Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test (Pelli et al., Citation1988); NART = National Adult Reading Test (Nelson, Citation1982); DSST = Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Wechsler, Citation1981); PANAS = Positive and Negative Affectivity Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, Citation1988); HADS = The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond & Snaith, Citation1983); ERQ, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, Citation2003).

Note. For trial type: Same = probe in same location as emotional face; Different = probe in different position to emotional face. Standard deviations are shown in parentheses.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 372.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.