674
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Score Tests for Extra-Zero Models in Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Models

&
Pages 92-108 | Received 20 Nov 2006, Accepted 20 Aug 2008, Published online: 07 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

When overdispersion is present in count data, a negative binomial (NB) model is commonly used in place of the standard Poisson model. However, the model is sometimes not adequate because of the occurrence of excess zeros and a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZNB) model may be more appropriate. This article proposes a general score test statistic for comparing a ZNB regression model to the NB model and the test is extended to a composite score test. Simulation results indicate that the test performs reasonably well and has a sampling distribution under the null hypothesis (NB model) approximated by the usual χ2 distribution. Use of the test is illustrated on a set of apple shoot propagation data. The composite score test is found to indicate suitable models.

Mathematics Subject Classification:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referees for their comments, which helped them to improve the article.

Notes

For the constant λ models we have λ = exp(1.25) = 3.5. The explanatory variables are: x 1, a two-level factor with third-fifth observations in the first group; x 2, a variable with values uniformly distributed on (1, 3). With these values λ varies from 1.5–6.

x 1 denotes a two-level factor with third-fifth observations in first group. With these values λ varies from 2.0–5.75.

x 1 denotes a two-level factor with third-fifth observations in first group. With these values λ varies from 2.00–5.75, ω 1 varies from 0.15–0.20, and ω 2 varies from 0.25–0.55.

x 2 is a variate taking on n values uniformly distributed on (1, 3). With these values λ varies from 1.5–6.

x 2 is a variate taking on n values uniformly distributed on (1,3). With these values λ varies from 1.5–6, ω 1 varies from 0.05–0.24, and ω 2 varies from 0.26–0.65.

P is a two-level factor for photoperiod; H is a four-level factor for the BAP levels; Lin(H) is a linear trend over the levels of H (on the log-concentration scale for BAP); H*P represents a full interaction model.

P is a two-level factor for photoperiod; H is a four-level factor for the BAP levels; Lin(H) is a linear trend over the levels of H (on the log-concentration scale for BAP); H*P represents a full interaction model.

fails to converge.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,090.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.