106
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating the Effective Degrees of Freedom of the Delete-a-Group Jackknife

&
Pages 2649-2660 | Received 25 Oct 2012, Accepted 14 Dec 2012, Published online: 12 Jun 2014
 

Abstract

The delete-a-group jackknife is sometimes used when estimating the variances of statistics based on a large sample. We investigate heavily poststratified estimators for a population mean and a simple regression coefficient, where both full-sample and domain estimates are of interest. The delete-a-group (DAG) jackknife employing 30, 60, and 100 replicates is found to be highly unstable, even for large sample sizes. The empirical degrees of freedom of these DAG jackknives are usually much less than their nominal degrees of freedom. This analysis calls into question whether coverage intervals derived from replication-based variance estimators can be trusted for highly calibrated estimates.

Mathematics Subject Classification:

Acknowledgments

Much of this work was performed at the National Agricultural Statistics Service, where Dr. Kott was employed as a research statistician from 1987 until 2009, and where Dr. Garren was employed as a research statistician during the summers of 2007–2009.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,090.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.