156
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INFERENCE

A Comparison of Classical and Inverse Estimators in the Calibration Problem

, &
Pages 83-95 | Received 07 Oct 2005, Accepted 21 Apr 2006, Published online: 18 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

Deciding between classical and inverse regression estimators in a calibration setting has been a dilemma for applied statisticians for over three decades. One proposed resolution of this dilemma compares estimators of a predicted-value of the regressor variable based on an observed value of the dependent variable through the Pitman closeness criterion. Least squares and inverse least squares techniques are compared via simulation due to the complexity of the distribution used in the calculation, which depends upon the product of a linear and a quadratic form. We show that the inverse least squares procedure provides an estimator which is Pitman-closer to the calibration point, x 0, than the corresponding classical least squares approach when the calibration point is not too close to the sample average. We show the usefulness of this dominance in practical terms through an example, which involves leak detection in product transmission lines.

Mathematics Subject Classification:

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,069.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.