On the difference in inference and prediction between the joint and independent f-error models for seemingly unrelated regressions

Abstract

We consider likelihood and Bayesian inferences for seemingly unrelated (linear) regressions for the joint niultivariate terror (e.g. Zellner, 1976) and the independent t-error (e.g. Maronna, 1976) models. For likelihood inference, the scale matrix and the shape parameter for the joint terror model cannot be consistently estimated because of the lack of adequate information to identify the latter. The joint terror model also yields the same MLEs for the regression coefficients and the scale matrix as for the independent normal error model. which are not robust against outliers. Further, linear hypotheses with respect

to the regression coefficients also give rise to the same mill distributions AS for the independent normal error model, though the MLE has a non-normal limiting distribution. In contrast to the striking similarities between the joint t-error and the independent normal error models, the independent f-error model yields AiLEs that are lubust against uuthers. Since the MLE of the shape parameter reflects the tails of the data distributions, this model extends the independent normal error model for modeling data distributions with relatively t hicker tails. These differences are also discussed with respect to the posterior and predictive distributions for Bayesian inference.

Keywords:

• Bayesian inference
• GMANOVA
• growth curves models: maxi¬mum likelihood
• niultivariate normal distribution
• Robust Inference