428
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Capturing women’s voices: lived experiences of incivility during childbirth in the United States

, PhD, , BA & , PhD
Pages 689-699 | Received 03 Sep 2019, Accepted 15 Jul 2021, Published online: 25 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Increasing research has improved global awareness of mistreatment during childbirth. However, research primarily focuses on “higher-intensity” mistreatment during childbirth, and largely focuses on women outside the United States (U.S.). We address these gaps by exploring the phenomenology of incivility, a “lower-intensity” mistreatment, experienced by women during childbirth in the U.S. We used a combination of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative responses (N = 200) of experiences of incivility during childbirth. We identified nine primary themes of incivility: lack of empathy, denial/minimization, ignoring, pressure, privacy issues, breastfeeding/formula issues, identity-based, uncomfortable physical interactions, and silencing. Results demonstrate incivility is critical to consider as a form of mistreatment in childbirth because it violates respect. The results help nuance the understanding of how mistreatment is experienced in childbirth. Results also demonstrate unique manifestations of incivility were shaped by the sociopolitical context of the U.S. Implications for policy development and health outcomes are discussed.

Acknowledgments

During the period of manuscript preparation, E.A.V. was funded by the T32 Research Training Program in Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention at Northwestern University, Department of Preventive Medicine.

Data availability statement

The subset of data used in the current study are available upon request.

Disclosure statement

E.A.V has received a grant outside the submitted work by the National Institutes of Health, during the peer review process. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors, exclusively internal funding from the University of Michigan to complete this research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 444.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.