374
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Empiricism, paradigms, and data

Pages 343-351 | Received 29 Feb 2004, Accepted 02 Aug 2004, Published online: 03 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

Rather than being based on an indefensible distinction between empiricists and interpretivists, this essay argues that such a distinction, although generally held by many persons, is actually not defensible on the basis of a supposed theory–data interaction. Covering law explanations are not part of common theory in communication research. Paradigmatic distinctions are typically thought of as being fundamental to the point of irresolvable, and when they are based on philosophical positions should be sharply questioned. Research is best performed when paradigms do not limit the activity or the thought of researchers.

Notes

Robert N. Bostrom is Professor of Communication Emeritus at the University of Kentucky. Correspondence to: Robert N. Bostrom, 2295 Hifner Road, Versailles, KY 40383, USA. Tel: 859 873 0476; Email: [email protected].

Consider the following dialogue, occurring between Empiricist and his Dear One, on a trip to the country: Dear One: Look at those sheep—they've just been sheared! Empiricist: Sheared on this side, anyway.

Pavitt wonders why I said what I did about Berkeley, and I refer the reader to pages 24–27 in the Bobbs‐Merrill edition of A Treatise Concerning Human Understanding (Berkeley, Citation1710/1957). It certainly seems like mistrust to me.

I have no fear of being accused of making this statement to disarm criticism. I have witnesses.

I cheerfully join Senator Kerry in the brotherhood of “flip‐floppers.”

We have uncritically accepted Kuhn's view, and it surprises many of us to realize that not all historians of science agree with him. “Paradigm shifts” have been much more popular with social scientists than the “hard” scientists. Few other historians of science share Kuhn's interpretation of the history of science. Benjamin Cohen (Citation1985) is good example of such an historian, taking the view that the development of science is better described as gradualism.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Robert N. Bostrom Footnote

Robert N. Bostrom is Professor of Communication Emeritus at the University of Kentucky. Correspondence to: Robert N. Bostrom, 2295 Hifner Road, Versailles, KY 40383, USA. Tel: 859 873 0476; Email: [email protected].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 183.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.