“It was amazing and magical, but it was not a vacation at all.”: Examining U.S. maternity leave through a relational dialectics theory analysis

ABSTRACT

Using contrapuntal analysis to explore interviews with 25 women in the U.S., we contribute to understandings of maternity leave as an ideologically laden and contested experience through multilevel (micro-meso-macro) themes within centripetal-dominant and centrifugal-marginalized discourses. The centripetal discourse of Maternity Leave as a Manageable Transition (MLMT) animated leaves as restful vacations, relational experiences, and predictable processes designed to facilitate workplace re-entry. In contrast, the centrifugal discourse of Maternity Leave as Maternal Experience (MLME) framed maternity leave from a maternal-centric perspective characterizing leaves as spaces of effortful recovery, isolation, and fluid/unpredictable processes. We contribute to relational dialectics theory (RDT) by exposing the complexities and controversies surrounding motherhood, mothers’ wellbeing, and maternity leave in the United States with theoretical and practical implications.

KEYWORDS:

• Maternity leave
• motherhood
• relational dialectics
• contrapuntal analysis
• work-family negotiations

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.