White listeners’ responses to “sounding black” and “sounding white”: The effects of message content on judgments about language¹

The authors thank Marsha Stanback and Sheri Parks for their assistance in preparing the stimulus material for this study.

The effects of sounding black on white listeners’ perceptions of experiential and narrative content versus abstract and intellectual content were examined. Using the matched guise technique and 93 college student subjects, three hypotheses were tested: (1) Sounding black predisposes white listeners to respond more negatively to a speaker than sounding white, regardless of content; (2) Sounding black elicits more negative responses from white listeners when message content is abstract than when it is experiential; (3) Sounding black predisposes white listeners to describe the speaker in stereotypic terms. In addition to the three hypotheses, one research question was also posed: do white listeners focus their perceptions differently depending on whether a speaker “sounds black” or “sounds white” and depending on whether message content is abstract or experiential? Free descriptions and the Speech Dialect Attitudinal Scale were completed by the subjects. Hypothesis 1 was not supported. Hypotheses 2 and 3 gained partial support. Results on perceptual focusing suggest that both stereotypic and egocentric filters shape listener responses. Limitations, future research, and bidialectalism are discussed.

Notes

The authors thank Marsha Stanback and Sheri Parks for their assistance in preparing the stimulus material for this study.