Abstract
Proxy relationships between non-state challengers and their external state patrons in the Middle East are a factor that can weaken regional stability as non-state proxies become both a tool and a decisive factor in shaping inter-state competition between regional powers. As a result, non-state actors with regional influence must increasingly be factored into policy decisions in military, diplomatic and legal terms.
Acknowledgements
This article was adapted from the chapter “Proxy Agents: State and Non-State Alliances in the Middle East” of the book The Frailty of Authority: Borders, Non-State Actors and Power Vacuums in a Changing Middle East, edited by Lorenzo Kamel (Rome: Edizioni Nueva Cultura, 2017). The author would like to thank Emiliano Alessandri, Benedetta Berti, Lorenzo Kamel and Mark N. Katz for their valuable comments during the drafting process.
Notes
1 Miodownik and Barak, Nonstate Actors in Intrastate Conflicts.
2 Pearlman and Gallagher Cunningham, “Nonstate Actors, Fragmentation, and Conflict Processes”, 3.
3 See, for example, Williams, Violent Non-State Actors; Zohar, “Typology of Contemporary Armed Non-State Actors”; Bartolomei et al., Modeling Violent Non-State Actors.
4 Berti, “What’s in a name?”.
5 Valensi, ”Non-State Actors”.
6 For example, Fukuyama, “The Imperative of State-Building”; Milliken and Krause, ”State-Failure, Collapse and Reconstruction”.
7 Gaub, ”State Vacuums and Non-state Actors”.
8 See also Bassam Tibi on the “simultaneity of structural globalisation and cultural fragmentation”, in Tibi, “Islam in Global Politics”.
9 Treacher, ”Edward Said: Identity, Politics and History”.
10 Gaub, “State Vacuums and Non-state Actors”.
11 Gause, Beyond Sectarianism.
12 A notable exception is Vinci, “Anarchy, Failed States, and Armed Groups”, 295-314.
13 Gaub, “State Vacuums and Non-state Actors”.
14 Halawi, “Non-States of the Middle East”.
15 Gabrielsen, “Evolution of Hezbollah’s strategy”.
16 US State Department, 2015 Country Reports on Terrorism, https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2015/257520.htm.
17 Berti, “Lebanon”.
18 Sadjadpour and Taleblu, ”Iran, Leveraging Chaos”.
19 El-Bar, ”Proxies and Politics”.
20 Khatib, ”Hizbullah’s Political Strategy”.
21 Sadjadpour and Taleblu, ”Iran, Leveraging Chaos”.
22 Ibid.
23 For a closer examination of the role of Syria in Iran-Hezbollah relations, see Samii, ”A Stable Structure on Shifting Sands”.
24 Ramazani, “Ideology and Pragmatism”.
25 Sadjadpour and Taleblu, ”Iran, Leveraging Chaos”.
26 Berti, "Lebanon".
27 Ibid.
28 Levitt, “Waking Up the Neighbours”.
29 Ibid.
30 El-Bar, “Proxies and Politics”.
31 On the interplay between Iran’s regional ambitions and Hezbollah’s increasingly widened footprint, see Akbarzadeh, “Why does Iran need Hizbullah?”.
32 Levitt, “Waking Up the Neighbours”.
33 See, for example, Roberts, “Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood”. On the broader evolution of the Muslim Brotherhood, see Rosefsky Wickham, “The Muslim Brotherhood”, and Al-Anani, Inside the Muslim Brotherhood.
34 Fahmy, “Doha’s Domestic Troubles”.
35 Khatib, “Qatar and the recalibration of power”.
36 Echagüe, “Emboldened yet vulnerable”.
37 Roberts, “Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood”
38 Khatib, “Qatar and the recalibration of power”.
39 Ibish, “Qatar changes course”.
40 Roberts, “‘Qatar, the Ikhwan”.
41 See also Bacik, “Russia and Turkey’s Proxy War”.
42 Rabinovich, “The Russian-U.S. Relationship in Middle East”.
43 Suchkov, “How Russia sees Kurdish quest”.
44 Katz, ”Russia and the Syrian Kurds”.
45 Rabinovich, “Russian-U.S. Relationship in Middle East”.
46 Reynolds, “Vladimir Putin, Godfather of Kurdistan”.
47 Grove and Kesling, ”Russia pursues ties with Kurds”.
48 Ibid.
49 Reynolds, “Vladimir Putin, Godfather of Kurdistan”.
50 Baev, “Russia as an Opportunist or Spoiler?”.
51 Trofimov, “Russia’s long road to Middle East”.
52 Katz, ”Russia and the Syrian Kurds”.
53 Suchkov, “How Russia sees Kurdish quest”.
54 Katz, ”Russia and the Syrian Kurds”.
55 Halawi, “The Non-States of the Middle East”.