Presumed ecological speciation in blind mole rats: does soil type influence mate preferences?

Abstract

Reproductive isolation is a fundamental part of speciation processes. The establishing of reproductive isolation in speciation with ongoing gene flow is unlikely unless divergent selection is overruling gene flow homogenization, which seems to be most effective when combined with non-random mating. We explored whether assortative mating via female mate-choice contributes to reproductive isolation between populations of the blind mole rat Spalax galili inhabiting abutting rendzina-soil and basaltic-soil areas in a microsite similar to one in which ecological speciation has recently been suggested as a possible model driving the divergence between mole rats from the different soils. We performed T-maze experiments with mole rats captured in early winter (i.e. premating season) of 2 consecutive years and found no existence of females from either soil type preferring males originating from their own soils based on olfactory cues. In addition, inconsistent preferences for males based on soil type in tests with females that were tested twice were found. This suggests that female mate choice based on olfactory cues is unlikely to be an isolating barrier between the mole rats from the two soil types. In such circumstances, ecological speciation would have to occur through other mechanisms of divergent selection, such as reproductive isolation due to strong habitat (soil) preferences, vocalisation or seismic communication.

KEY WORDS:

• subterranean rodent
• blind mole rat
• Spalax
• ecological speciation
• assortative mating
• mate choice
• reproductive isolation

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Alena Lövy, Tereza Vlasatá and Kexin Li for their invaluable help during the capturing of mole rats. We are grateful to Klára Šíchová for her help with analysing behavioural data. We thank the two anonymous reviewers whose comments have greatly improved this manuscript.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ETHICAL STANDARD

All procedures involving wild-caught animals were approved by the Ethics Committee at the University of Haifa (no 352/14). S. galili is not listed as an endangered and protected species in Israel.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M. Lövy, R. Šumbera and E. Nevo conceived the idea. M. Lövy planned the methods, collected and analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. R. Šumbera, G. Heth and E. Nevo reviewed the drafts.

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by the Grantová Agentura České Republiky (project no 14-31670P).