2,225
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Preface to the Special Issue

Groundwater–surface water interactions in Canada

&
Pages 451-454 | Received 19 Jan 2016, Accepted 27 Jan 2016, Published online: 24 Nov 2016

Canada is a water-rich country. Its rivers and lakes comprise 7% of the global annually renewable surface fresh water supply (Rivera Citation2014). Although it is very difficult to quantify available groundwater resources, it is estimated that there is more groundwater in Canadian aquifers than surface water in rivers and lakes, similar to what is observed elsewhere (Rivera Citation2014). In the generally humid and cold Canadian climate, groundwater–surface water interactions are omnipresent (Devito et al. Citation1996; Langston et al. Citation2013; Brannen et al. Citation2015; Foster and Allen Citation2015), but remain relatively seldom studied. The Canadian Council of Academies (CCA Citation2009, 185) expert panel on groundwater concluded that a sustainable use of groundwater resources requires that “groundwater and surface water be characterised and managed as an integrated system within the context of the hydrological cycle in a watershed or groundwatershed.” It is only reasonable to expand this recommendation to surface water resources.

This has been a growing concern in the last two decades as groundwater and surface water are increasingly considered a single resource (Winter et al. Citation1998). Using integrated approaches to understanding and managing water resources is increasingly important given the growing demand for water related to development, industry and agriculture (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] Citation2015), and the superimposed stress of a changing climate (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] Citation2014). These issues are relevant in a variety of geological and climate conditions around the world, especially in densely developed areas and in dry climates (IPCC Citation2014). However, the stresses on groundwater–surface water connections should not be overlooked in water-rich countries such as Canada, despite water scarcity not imposing a significant hindrance to development in most regions. It has been reported that some Canadian regions have only limited groundwater and surface-water reservoirs (Cook and Bakker Citation2012). Moreover, water quality is a growing concern that will be exacerbated in a changing climate (e.g. Crossman et al. Citation2013), and groundwater-dependent ecosystems are increasingly threatened by human development (e.g. Smerdon et al. Citation2012).

Groundwater–surface water interactions are most often thought of as the connection between aquifers and rivers. In temperate and humid climates, such as those found in Canada, groundwater most often flows into rivers, where it contributes to maintaining river low flows during dry periods, whereas the opposite is more common in dry climates. This groundwater influx provides thermal refugia and supplies nutrients for a variety of plant and animal species (e.g. Kurylyk et al. Citation2015). Groundwater–wetland and groundwater–lake connections are expressions of similar processes where an aquifer provides water to a shallow surface-water reservoir, or vice versa (e.g. Winter Citation1999). When water flows from an aquifer to a wetland or a lake, it regulates humidity and temperature conditions which sustain rich ecosystems (e.g. Hoffmann et al. Citation2009). When water flows from a wetland or lake to an aquifer (typically in drier climates), it contributes to the recharge of underground reservoirs. Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is yet another flowpath through which aquifers provide water to marine environments (e.g. Burnett et al. Citation2003). Salt-water intrusion is the corresponding opposite pathway of this connection (e.g. Ferguson and Gleeson Citation2012). SGD is extremely important in coastal areas around the world, where a large proportion of the world’s population lives.

Considering the importance of groundwater–surface water interactions, relatively little is known about the geological and climate conditions under which these exchanges prevail, how and where they occur, and what affects their stability. More knowledge on this topic is necessary to provide essential information on Canadian water resources, and crucial new data for integrated water resources management. The purpose of this Special Issue is to highlight the variety of issues related to groundwater–surface water interactions, and recent developments in the methods used to study these interactions under a range of conditions across Canada. The inspiration for publishing this Special Issue in the Canadian Water Resources Journal was the large number of high-level contributions to the Groundwater–Surface Water Interactions session of the GeoMontreal2013 conference, which was also the 11th joint Canadian Geotechnical Society – International Association of Hydrogeologists Canadian National Chapter (CGS-IAH-CNC) conference, held in Montreal in October 2013. Many of the authors who contributed to this session responded positively to the invitation, and were joined by other Canadian experts on groundwater–surface water interactions. This Special Issue contains eight contributions from university researchers and private consultants on topics that are relevant to regions across Canada.

The highly diversified geology and climate of Canada provide a large variety of aquifer types, and recharge and groundwater flow conditions (Rivera Citation2014). A large array of river flow conditions are also observed throughout the country. As a result, groundwater–surface water interactions are expected to vary significantly from one region to the next, as well as over time. In eastern Canada, Chaillou et al. (Citation2016) studied SGD in the Magdeleine Islands archipelago of Quebec (Maritimes Permo–Carboniferous Basin of the Northeastern Appalachian Geological Province), where groundwater resources are strictly dependent on precipitation and flow in the Atlantic Ocean. Chaillou et al. (Citation2016) provide a first estimate of volumetric and chemical groundwater fluxes to a coastal Canadian ocean.

Similar to those in other regions of the world, many Canadian rivers have undergone significant changes over the last several decades as a result of regulation, drainage systems, dyking and removal of flood retention areas (World Wildlife Fund [WWF] Citation2009). When still present, natural riparian conditions can be the focal point of a variety of aquifer–river connections, providing water storage during floods, and rich ecosystems in an otherwise homogeneous agricultural landscape (e.g. Bullock and Acreman Citation2003). Buffin-Bélanger et al. (Citation2016) highlight the complex relationship between flood event discharge and groundwater flooding in the gravelly floodplain of the Matane River (Gaspésie region). Their work provides important new data on how groundwater floodwaves could be included in flood mapping. Larocque et al. (Citation2016) illustrate how geomorphic setting can control groundwater–surface water exchanges in riverine wetlands located in the Matane River floodplain, and at the limit of the St. Lawrence Lowlands/Appalachian Foothills of the Montérégie region (Champlain Sea silt and clay deposits).

A better understanding of aquifer recharge is necessary to predict groundwater discharge to surface reservoirs. Because of the ever-increasing pressure from urban sprawl, various industries and industrial agriculture, river low flows, wetlands and springs can be threatened by drainage and by contracting recharge areas. Understanding the connections between recharge and discharge is crucial to implementing better management and conservation methods. Levison et al. (Citation2016) investigated groundwater recharge and discharge through rivers and springs in the Covey Hill area of southern Quebec, at the northernmost extension of the Adirondack Mountains (Potsdam Group of the Covey Hill Formation). The improved understanding of how the natural system responded to a wide range of climatic conditions over the last century provides insight into its resilience to future climate change. Marchildon et al. (Citation2016) studied ecologically significant groundwater recharge areas (ESGRA) of the Oro Moraine in the glaciated landscape of southern Ontario. ESGRAs are areas of land supporting hydraulic pathways that sustain sensitive groundwater-dependent ecosystems, such as coldwater streams and wetlands. Identifying ESGRAs provides a means of protecting them from development and ensuring the maintenance of the groundwater-fed ecosystems they support. Through a synthesis of existing science, tools and experience, Bradford (Citation2016) provides an important overview of how to avert the degradation of southern Ontario’s wetlands.

Alpine watersheds represent an important source of water in many areas of the world, where they contribute to the sustainance of downstream water sources. The contribution of groundwater to the total flow of alpine rivers is still poorly understood. Paznekas and Hayashi (Citation2016) provide new insight into this question through their investigation of the physiographical factors that control the hydrogeological behavior of mountain river basins in the Rocky and Columbia Mountain Ranges. Their study shows that geological and hydraulic properties are the dominating factors influencing winter flows in the studied alpine rivers.

Temperate climate valleys are regions of intensive agricultural production worldwide. These often develop in Quaternary deposits, which host extensive and productive aquifers to which river systems are dynamically connected. By maintaining low flows, groundwater contributions to these rivers contribute to maintaining healthy ecosystems. Middleton et al. (Citation2016) compare two watersheds which drain the Abbotsford–Sumas sand and gravel aquifer in the Lower Fraser Valley of southwest British Columbia, and show that local conditions can influence aquifer–river connections.

State-of-the-art methods to study groundwater–surface water interactions are numerous and diverse (see Kalbus et al. Citation2006 for a summary). The papers in this Special Issue highlight an array of available methods, and examples of how and under what conditions they can be used. Among the field methods typically used to identify and quantify the interactions, contributions included here use flow rate and water level monitoring (Larocque et al. Citation2016; Middleton et al. Citation2016; Paznekas and Hayashi Citation2016), water temperature as an indicator of groundwater inflow to a river (Larocque et al. Citation2016; Middleton et al. Citation2016), and dissolved organic and inorganic carbon (Chaillou et al. Citation2016). Time-series analyses of water levels and water temperature of rivers and aquifers are used to identify connections between underground and surface reservoirs (Buffin-Bélanger et al. Citation2016; Larocque et al. Citation2016). Groundwater flow modeling and particle tracking are integrative approaches which require abundant data to describe the studied conditions; data are usually acquired through aquifer characterization. Models can be used to understand flow directions to surface features (Marchildon et al. Citation2016) and to quantify groundwater discharge to rivers and springs (Levison et al. Citation2016). They are particularly relevant to understanding past and future conditions, which can be linked to climate change scenarios, as illustrated by Levison et al. (Citation2016). Distinct insight into current conditions and a clearer understanding of changing conditions in groundwater–surface water interactions can also be gained through the interpretation of policy statements (Bradford Citation2016). This approach is particularly interesting as a means of providing science-based understanding to management approaches.

The topics covered by the articles in this Special Issue are necessarily incomplete in that they do not address all possible conditions that can be encountered in Canada, nor all of the methods that could be applied. Other reviews have reported wider geological and climatic conditions, flow connections between different reservoirs and at different scales, and a more exhaustive array of methods (e.g. Brunke and Gonser Citation1997; Sear et al. Citation1999; Amoros and Bornette Citation2002; Krause et al. Citation2011,Citation 2014). Nevertheless, we believe that this Special Issue provides a valuable snapshot of the current, state-of-the-art knowledge on groundwater–surface water interactions across the country. It also provides new knowledge on the conditions under which these interactions occur, as well as the methods that can be used in given situations. It is our hope that it will generate interest in the initiation of new projects on this matter of critical importance for integrated water resource management.

Acknowledgements

This Special Issue has brought together hydrogeology experts, specializing in different areas of groundwater–surface water interactions. We wish to thank the authors who have contributed to advancing knowledge on a wide variety of topics related to this very important question. We also thank the reviewers who have contributed to the high scientific level achieved by the Special Issue and all its comprising articles.

References

  • Amoros, C., and G. Bornette. 2002. Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biology 47(4): 761–776.
  • Bradford, A. 2016. Averting degradation of southern Ontario wetlands due to hydrologic alterations associated with development. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1119061.
  • Brannen, R., C. Spence, and A. Ireson. 2015. Influence of shallow groundwater–surface water interactions on the hydrological connectivity and water budget of a wetland complex. Hydrological Processes 29(18): 3862–3877.
  • Brunke, M., and T. Gonser. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37(1): 1–33.
  • Buffin-Bélanger, T., C. A. Cloutier, C. Tremblay, G. Chaillou, and M. Larocque. 2016. Dynamics of groundwater floodwaves and floodings in an alluvial aquifer. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1102651.
  • Bullock, A., and M. Acreman. 2003. The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 7(3): 358–389.
  • Burnett, W. C., H. Bokuniewicz, M. Huettel, W. S. Moore, and M. Taniguchi. 2003. Groundwater and pore water inputs to the coastal zone. Biogeochemistry 66(1–2): 3–33.
  • Canadian Council of Academies (CCA). 2009. The sustainable management of groundwater in Canada – The expert panel on groundwater. Report prepared for the Government of Canada, Canadian Council of Academies, Ottawa, 270
  • Chaillou, G., F. Lemay-Borduas, and M. Couturier. 2016. Transport and transformations of groundwater-borne carbon discharging through a sandy beach to a coastal ocean. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1111775.
  • Cook, C., and K. Bakker. 2012. Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change 22: 94–102.
  • Crossman, J., M. N. Futter, S. K. Oni, P. G. Whitehead, L. Jin, D. Butterfield, H. M. Baulch, and P. J. Dillon. 2013. Impacts of climate change on hydrology and water quality: Future proofing management strategies in the Lake Simcoe watershed. Canada. Journal of Great Lakes Research 39(1): 19–32.
  • Devito, K. J., A. R. Hill, and N. Roulet. 1996. Groundwater–surface water interactions in headwater forested wetlands of the Canadian Shield. Journal of Hydrology 181(1–4): 127–147.
  • Ferguson, G., and T. Gleeson. 2012. Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nature Climate Change 2: 342–345.
  • Foster, S. B., and D. M. Allen.2015. Groundwater–surface water interactions in a mountain-to-coast watershed: Effects of climate change and human stressors. Advances in Meteorology 2015: Article ID 861805, 22 pp.
  • Hoffmann, C. C., C. Kjaergaard, J. Uusi-Kämppä, H. C. Bruun Hansen, and B. Kronvang. 2009. Phosphorus retention in riparian buffers: Review of their efficiency. Journal of Environmental Quality 38(5): 1942–1955.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change fifth assessment report – Climate change 2013/2014 (Vol 2): Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1820 pp.
  • Kalbus, E., F. Reinstorf, and M. Schirmer. 2006. Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: A review. Hydrology and Earth System Science 10: 873–887.
  • Krause, S., F. Boano, M. O. Cuthbert, J. H. Fleckenstein, and J. Lewandowski. 2014. Understanding process dynamics at aquifer–surface water interfaces: An introduction to the special section on new modeling approaches and novel experimental technologies. Water Resources Research 50: 1847–1855. doi:10.1002/2013WR014755.
  • Krause, S., D. M. Hannah, J. H. Fleckenstein, C. M. Heppell, D. Kaeser, R. Pickup, G. Pinay, A. L. Robertson, and P. J. Wood. 2011. Inter-disciplinary perspectives on processes in the hyporheic zone. Ecohydrology 4(4): 481–499.
  • Kurylyk, B. L., K. T. B. MacQuarrie, T. Linnansaari, R. A. Cunjak, and R. A. Curry. 2015. Preserving, augmenting, and creating cold-water thermal refugia in rivers: Concepts derived from research on the Miramichi River. New Brunswick (Canada). Ecohydrology 8(6):1095–1108. doi:10.1002/eco.1566.
  • Langston, G., M. Hayashi, and J. W. Roy. 2013. Quantifying groundwater–surface water interactions in a proglacial moraine using heat and solute tracers. Water Resources Research 49(9): 5411–5426.
  • Larocque, MP. M. Biron, T. Buffin-Bélanger, M. Needelman, C. A. Cloutier, J. M. McKenzie. 2016. Role of the geomorphic setting in controlling groundwater–surface water exchanges in riverine wetlands – A case study from two southern Québec rivers (Canada). Canadian Water Resources Journal.
  • Levison, J. K., M. Larocque, M. A. Ouellet, O. Ferland, and C. Poirier. 2016. Long-term trends in groundwater recharge and discharge in a fractured bedrock aquifer – Past and future conditions. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1037795.
  • Marchildon, M., P. J. Thompson, S. Cuddy, E. J. Wexler, K. Howson, and J. D. C. Kassenaar. 2016. A methodology for identifying ecologically significant groundwater recharge areas. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1080125.
  • Middleton, M. A., D. M. Allen, and P. H. Whitfield. 2016. Comparing the groundwater contribution in two groundwater-fed streams using a combination of methods. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1068136.
  • Paznekas, A., and M. Hayashi. 2016. Groundwater contribution to winter streamflow in the Canadian Rockies. Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1060870.
  • Rivera, A., ed. 2014. Canada’s groundwater resources. Markham, ON: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 824 pp.
  • Sear, D. A., P. D. Armitage, and F. H. Dawson. 1999. Groundwater dominated rivers. Hydrological Processes 13(3): 255–276.
  • Smerdon, B. D., C. A. Mendoza, and K. J. Devito. 2012. The impact of gravel extraction on groundwater dependent wetlands and lakes in the Boreal Plains. Canada. Environmental Earth Sciences 67(5): 1249–1259.
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2015. The United Nations world water development report 2015: Water for a sustainable world. UNESCO, Paris, France. 139 pp.
  • Winter, T. C. 1999. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal 7 (1): 28–45.
  • Winter, T. C., J. W. Harvey, O. L. Franke, and W. M. Alley. 1998. Ground water and surface water: A single resource. USGS Circular 1139, USGS, Denver, Colorado, 79 pp.
  • World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2009. Canada’s rivers at risk: Environmental flows and Canada’s freshwater future, WWF-Canada, Toronto: 17 pp.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.