Abstract
The European Union (EU) and United States (US) are the world’s two largest and most influential legal jurisdictions for corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The pressures of international economic competition have lead to a flurry of M & A activity in these locales in the post-Cold War period. Given the economic impact and, in many cases, political sensitivity of some M&As, it has become critical that transatlantic regulators reach similar decisions with regard to M&A approval, denial, or modification. Incongruent decisions lead to uncertainty in the marketplace, and the possible loss of global economic competitiveness and respect for regulatory processes and outcomes. In this paper, we explore the efforts made by the US and EU over the past two decades to enhance cooperation in merger policies and processes. We argue that, despite a couple of high-profile cases to the contrary, the US and EU have made great strides in reducing uncertainty in the M&A regulatory process by institutionalizing a series of formal agreements and working groups that have served to provide the foundation for a transatlantic merger environment that may serve as a model for cross-border regulatory cooperation in the twenty-first century.
Notes
1. For earlier examples of this comparative trend, see Fox (Citation2007), Barnett (Citation2006), Monti (Citation2004, 2001a), Pate (Citation2004), James (Citation2001, Citation2002), Schaub (Citation2002), Melamed (Citation2000), Gerber (Citation1999). Regarding the occasional disputes, for a recent case of disagreement see the 2009 Sun Oracle merger.
2. For a thorough analysis of the content of the Bilateral Agreement, see Ham (Citation1993).
4. H.R. Res. 191, 105th Cong. (1997), 143 Cong. Record 5550 (1997); S. Res. 108, 105th Cong. (1997), 143 Cong. Record 7609 (1997).
5. For the exact remedies, see Boeing (1997).
6. This is not to claim that the cooperative framework was perfected following the lessons learned from BMD. For example, the GE–Honeywell merger (2001) is often identified as a subsequent case in which cooperation was less than perfect (Morgan and McGuire Citation2004).
7. In 1998, the EU and US also signed a Positive Comity Agreement to clarify how positive comity should work in practice. Because domestic EU and US laws require competition regulators to initiate investigations into mergers that meet certain thresholds, the PCA does not apply to merger cases.
8. Indeed, the EU allowed US competition officials to attend EU oral hearings as observers in the BMD case.
9. However, reciprocal attendance does not guarantee convergent decisions. For example, see the 1999 BOC/Air Liquide merger.
11. Commission Notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and under Commission Regulation (EC) No 447/98, OJ C 68, 2.3.2001, pp. 3–11.
Fox
,
E.M.
2007
.
“
GE/Honeywell: the US merger that Europe stopped: a story of the politics of convergence
”
. In
Antitrust stories
,
Edited by:
Fox
,
E.M.
and
Crane
,
D.A.
331
–
60
.
New York
:
Foundation Press
.
Barnett, T.O. 2006. Merger work in the ICN: the challenge of substantive convergence. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the International Competition Network, Cape Town, South Africa, 3 May.
Monti, M. 2004. Convergence in EU–US antitrust policy regarding mergers and acquisitions: an EU perspective. UCLA Law First Annual Institute on US and EU Antitrust Aspects of Mergers and Acquisitions, Los Angeles, CA, 28 February.
Pate, R.H. 2004. Antitrust in a transatlantic context — from the Cicada’s perspective. Antitrust in a transatlantic context conference. Brussels, Belgium, 7 June.
James, C.A. 2001. International antitrust in the twenty-first century: cooperation and convergence. Paper presented at the OECD Global Forum on Competition, Paris, France, 17 October.
James, C.A. 2002. Antitrust in the early twenty-first century: core values and convergence. Program on antitrust policy in the twenty-first century, Brussels, Belgium, 15 May.
Schaub, A. 2002. Co-operation in competition policy enforcement between the EU and the US and new concepts evolving at the World Trade Organisation and the International Competition Network. Mentor Group, Brussels, Belgium, 4 April.
Melamed, D.A. 2000. Promoting sound antitrust enforcement in the global economy. Paper presented at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute, 27th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy, New York, NY, 19 October.
Gerber
,
D.J.
1999
.
The US–European conflict over the globalization of antitrust law: a legal experience perspective
.
New England Law Review
,
34
(
1
)
:
123
–
43
.
Ham
,
A.D.
1993
.
International cooperation in the anti-trust field and in particular the agreement between the United States of American and the Commission of the European Communities
.
Common Market Law Review
,
30
:
39
–
62
.
Damro
,
C.
2001
.
Building an international identity: the EU and extraterritorial competition policy
.
Journal of European Public Policy
,
8
(
2
)
:
208
–
26
.
Boeder
,
T.L.
2000
.
“
The Boeing–McDonnell Douglas merger
”
. In
Antitrust goes global: what future for transatlantic cooperation?
,
Edited by:
Evenett
,
S.J.
,
Lehmann
,
A.
and
Steil
,
B.
139
–
44
.
Washington
,
DC
:
Brookings Institution Press
.
Van Miert
,
K.
2000
.
Le Marché et le Pouvoir: Sourvenirs d’un Commissaire Européen
,
Brussels
,
, Belgium
:
Editions Racine
.
Karpel, A.A. 1998. The European Commission’s decision on the Boeing–McDonnell Douglas merger and the need for greater US–EU cooperation in the merger field. The American University Law Review 47, April: 1029–69.
Peck
,
B.
1998
.
Extraterritorial application of antitrust laws and the US–EU dispute over the Boeing and McDonnell Douglas merger: from comity to conflict?
.
San Diego Law Review
,
35
:
1163
–
214
.
Fox, E.M. 1997. Lessons from Boeing: a modest proposal to keep politics out of antitrust. Antitrust Report November: 19–24.
Snyder
,
D.
1997
.
Mergers and acquisitions in the European Community and the United States: a movement toward a uniform enforcement body
.
Law and Policy in International Business
,
29
:
115
–
44
.
Morgan
,
E.J.
and
McGuire
,
S.
2004
.
Transatlantic divergence. GE–Honeywell and the EU’s merger policy
.
Journal of European Public Policy
,
11
(
1
)
:
39
–
56
.
Damro
,
C.
2011
.
Regulators, firms and information: the domestic sources of convergence in transatlantic merger review
.
Review of International Political Economy
,
18
(
4
)
:
409
–
35
.