740
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The transformation of political elites in the European Union after 2008. What is next after the constraining dissensus?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 421-437 | Published online: 26 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The European Union has witnessed a transformation of national political elites in the last decade. In addition to local factors, this is caused by a range of broader societal and political discontinuities. By applying Higley’s model of political elite transformation to the Eurozone- and migration crises, we reveal the nature of this transformation: political elites today are more differentiated and less united than a decade ago. The analysis shows that the discontinuities brought forth newly founded political parties and strengthened those with previously little voice in decision-making. These new elites reflect the Euroscepticism of an increasing proportion of their constituency. Thus, we argue that the European political landscape has moved beyond the constraining dissensus to a post-constraining dissensus, where national elites themselves challenge European integration. As elite transformation continues, the process of European integration will have to grapple with the realities of increased elite diversity for the foreseeable future.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviews for their helpful comments. They also wish to express great gratitude to Claus Offe and Helmut K. Anheier for their valuable remarks on the drafts of as well as to thank Josephine Graef and Alexander Filip for their insights that helped us develop our argument.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. The differentiation of Member States follows established lines in the literature reinforced during the Eurocrisis (e.g. Börzel and Risse Citation2018): Northern Member States: from Austria to Sweden, South: from Portugal to Greece, and Eastern Europe: Visegrad countries. Choosing these three regions is sufficient to make apparent the broad trends under investigation, as each has been particularly affected by the appearing crises.

2. The notable exception is Ireland itself recipient of a bailout, witnessed significant losses for the established parties, in response to the economic crisis. Incumbent Fianna Fail lost 24.1% in the 2011 election, and the 2015 election cost the Labour Party 12.9% and Fine Gael 10.6%.

Additional information

Funding

The research for this project was funded by Stiftung Mercator through the Dahrendorf Forum, a joint initiative of the London School of Economics and the Hertie School. The views contained herein are those of the authors alone.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 97.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.