ABSTRACT
Scholars working on sovereignty in the EU have been quick to dismiss the French governments’ European sovereignty discourse as a metaphor. In this article, we situate our argument and methodology within the broader literature on sovereignty conflicts in the EU. We demonstrate that the use of sovereignty regarding European integration has evolved in French Presidents’ discourses throughout the Vth Republic. Far from being an invention of President Macron, the term European sovereignty builds on existing discourses by past French presidents since the Mitterrand years. The term European sovereignty has so far been successful and aligned with a more general tendency towards ‘rebordering’ the EU. Important normative issues however remain. Legitimizing the EU on the basis of security concerns can threaten its liberal and cosmopolitan foundations. Second, redefining sovereignty as a capacity to act rather than a legitimate right to rule may prove to be unsustainable.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the organisers and participants of the April 2022 Paris German Historical Institute colloquium 'Sovereignty: the mutations of a concept in France and Germany, 14th-21st centuries' for giving us the opportunity to present an earlier version of this article, and, Amandine Crespy and two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. Interview with a member state diplomat, country non-disclosed, 14 January 2022.
2. Interview with a member state ambassador to Political and Security Committee (PSC), country non-disclosed, 20 April 2022 (phone).