Abstract
This article considers the contribution that Adam Smith's work can make to current scholarship on the political significance of friendship. Smith's approach to friendship is important because he decouples it from intimacy and uses friendship to theorise solidarity and mutual identification between strangers. He theorises not only the friend, but also the stranger, and furthermore, their interrelationship. So closely are the friend and the stranger intertwined in his work that scholars have recently coined the term ‘strangership’ to describe his characterisation of amicable stranger relations. Smith does develop a rich concept of sympathy as the animating principle of stranger relations. I argue, however, that Smith's approach remains limited by his weak and depoliticised conception of strangership, which is premised on the similarity of strangers and obscures difference, exclusion and inequality. Addressing these limitations is important for developing understandings of political friendship and strangership appropriate to diverse societies of unequal strangers.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Jesse Carlson, Laura Eramian, Mervyn Horgan, Vince Marotta and the members of the Canadian Network for Critical Sociology for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article. Valuable funding was provided through a grant from the St Francis Xavier University Council on Research.
Notes
1. Aristotle's and other important philosophical accounts of friendship can be found in Pakaluk (Citation1991).
2. There is now a substantial literature on political friendship. For an excellent overview and a substantial bibliography, see Devere and Smith (Citation2010).
3. One of the subtlest accounts of these constitutive tensions of friendship is still Pitt-Rivers’ description (Citation1961: 138–40).
4. In addition to Arendt (Citation1968: 24) see also Allan's (Citation1989) description of the modern ideology of friendship as well as Silver's discussion of private friendship (Citation1997).