960
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unpacking vulnerability in academic writing and publishing: a tale of two non-native English speaker scholars in China

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 981-995 | Received 16 Dec 2019, Accepted 13 Nov 2020, Published online: 30 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Adopting ‘vulnerability’ as an analytical lens and informed by a qualitative case study approach, the present study investigates two Chinese scholars’ academic writing and publishing practice. The findings reveal different sources and forms of vulnerability that influenced the participants’ professional engagements, social interactions and emotional experiences in academic writing and publishing. The findings also demonstrate how the participants developed their advanced academic literacy about writing and micropolitical literacy about publishing to cope with potential vulnerability, and went on to construct their preferred identities as academic researchers and writers. The paper ends with some practical implications on how to promote a supportive and sustainable publishing culture in higher education.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 494.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.