341
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Trust the people, not the institution’: university preparation for the Research Assessment Exercise 2020 in Hong Kong

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 633-648 | Received 06 Apr 2021, Accepted 01 Jun 2022, Published online: 12 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

A considerable body of studies on neoliberalism in higher education has conducted macro-level philosophical analyses regarding the effects of assessment regimes on university management. This article expands the literature by providing an important set of empirical findings pertaining to Hong Kong universities’ coping strategies in preparing their academics for the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE 2020). Based on 16 in-depth interviews and document review at two universities in Hong Kong, this study reveals that the institutional preparation for the RAE 2020 can be considered as a multifaceted discourse that complexly interweaves managerialism and academic professionalism. This article further discusses how neoliberal forces, as manifested in the RAE 2020 policy, are locally interpreted, resisted and negotiated as they are shaped by different local contextual factors. The findings indicate the need for greater commitment to academic professionalism in research management and stress the importance of manager-academics’ benign and mediating engagement in the coping process.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous participants in this study for their incredible generosity and support. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Task Force on Review of Research Policy and Funding. (2018). Review Report. https://www.ugc. edu.hk/doc/eng/ugc/publication/report/report20180911/review_report.pdf.

2 UGC (Citation2021). University Grants Committee RAE 2020 – Panel Membership. https://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/activity/research/rae/pm/rae2020pm.html

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by University of Hong Kong’s Seed Fund for Basic Research [grant number 201711159252].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 494.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.