The generic skills debate in research higher degrees

Abstract

Generic or transferable skills as outcomes of research higher degrees have been the subject of considerable development and debate in universities in recent times. The development of generic skills has been motivated by the belief that there are skills which all graduates should possess, and which would be applicable to a wide range of tasks and contexts beyond the university setting. This paper reviews these developments and debates drawing on a literature from the USA, the UK, with particular reference to Australia. It cites examples of generic skills programs and considers evidence of students’ responses to them. Reviewing criticisms which have been levelled at the idea of generic skills in research higher degrees, the discussion identifies a number of questions which need to be addressed if this development is to succeed.

Notes

Corresponding author. School of Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia. Email: [email protected]

The project, entitled ‘The Doctoral Curriculum: Needs and directions in research training’, is funded by the Higher Education Division of the Australian Department of Education, Science and Technology. The quotes are taken from interviews with supervisors conducted across four fields of research in six universities.