![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
Abstract
Concerns with postdoctoral research training and employment outcomes are growing at an international level. Recent studies of postdoctoral and other contract researchers in various countries emphasize common issues associated with these appointments, including the absence of any systematic definition of postdoctoral research positions, lack of policy and data on postdoctoral researchers, and increasing dissatisfaction among postdoctoral researchers with the nature of their position and with their future employment prospects. These issues are explored further in the study reported here, through an interview‐based investigation of the views of both postdoctoral researchers and postdoctoral supervisors with regard to the nature of postdoctoral research positions and the career development support provided within those positions. Key findings include substantial variation in the functions of postdoctoral researchers, and in the perceived purposes of such positions. Despite a widespread perception among both postdocs and their supervisors of limited employment opportunities in academia or research positions, there was a consistent focus among both parties on the postdoctoral period as providing preparation for such positions.
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was funded by the Evaluations and Investigation Programme (EIP) of the Australian Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs and by the Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods of the Australian National University. This paper draws on the original EIP report (Thomson et al., 2001), in particular, Chapter 4. However, the conclusions are those of the present author.
Notes
* Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. Email: [email protected]