270
Views
59
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Papers

The Effect of Wheat Bran Particle Size on Laxation and Colonic Fermentation

, MD, PhD, FACN, , PhD, , PhD, , MSc, , MD, , MSc, , RD, , RD, , RD, , MSc, , BS & , PhD show all
Pages 339-345 | Received 01 Oct 1998, Accepted 01 Dec 1998, Published online: 07 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

Objective: Due to perceived inferior fecal bulking ability, finely ground wheat bran is not recommended for treatment of colonic disorders, despite possible short chain fatty acid generation with potential benefits for colonic mucosal health. We therefore tested the effects of very fine particle size wheat bran on colonic function.

Methods: Two studies, each with three phases, were undertaken in healthy subjects in a randomized crossover design. In one study (metabolic, n=23) subjects took three diets containing either an additional 19 g/d dietary fiber with mean particle size (MPS) 50μm or 758μm in bread or a control low fiber bread. In the other study where the supplement was provided as a breakfast cereal (ad libitum, n=24) the respective wheat bran MPS were 692μm and 1158μm and the control was low fiber. Fecal collections were obtained during the last week of each diet. In the metabolic study, fecal short chain fatty acids were measured and 12-hour breath gas collections obtained.

Results: In both studies, wheat bran supplements significantly increased fecal bulk compared to the control (p<0.004), with no significant differences between brans of different particle size and no differences in fecal water content. However, higher fecal butyrate concentrations (p<0.007), butyrate output and breath CH4 levels (p=0.025) were seen on the low MPS wheat bran compared to the other two treatments, suggesting increased bacterial fermentation.

Conclusions: Fine MPS wheat bran is an effective fecal bulking agent and may have added advantages if increased butyrate concentrations promote colonic mucosal integrity.

Funded by the University-Industry Research Partnership Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and The Kellogg Company, Toronto, Canada.

The authors wish to thank Kellogg Canada Inc, Etobicoke, ON; Parrheim Foods Ltd, Saskatoon, SK; Loblaw Brands Ltd, Toronto, ON; Westhill Dairy Inc, Downsview, ON; Bestfoods Canada Inc, Etobicoke, ON; and Kraft Canada Inc, Don Mills, ON, for the generous donation of foods used in this study. The authors would also like to extend sincere thanks to Ken Fulcher of Parrheim Foods Ltd; Kathy Galbraith of Natural Temptations Bakery, Burlington, ON; Beth Olson of The Kellogg Company, Battle Creek, MI; Robert Chenaux and Larry Griffin of Loblaw Brands Ltd, Jim Smith of Westhill Dairy Inc, Jeanne D’Arc Charron of Bestfoods Canada Inc, and Dayle Sunohara of Kraft Canada Inc, for their assistance on this project. Thanks are also extended to Renato Novokmet, George Koumbridis and Nalini Irani who provided excellent technical assistance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 139.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.