ABSTRACT
Objective: The present study compares the effect of ingesting hydrolyzed beef protein, whey protein, and carbohydrate on performance, body composition (via plethysmography), muscular thickness, and blood indices of health, including ferritin concentrations, following a 10-week intervention program.Methods: After being randomly assigned to one of the following groups—beef, whey, or carbohydrate—24 master-age (35–60 years old) male triathletes (n = 8 per treatment) ingested 20 g of supplement mixed with plain water once a day (immediately after training or before breakfast). All measurements were performed pre- and postinterventions.Results: Only beef significantly reduced body mass (p = 0.021) along with a trend to preserve or increase thigh muscle mass (34.1 ± 6.1 vs 35.5 ± 7.4 mm). Both whey (38.4 ± 3.8 vs 36.9 ± 2.8 mm) and carbohydrate (36.0 ± 4.8 vs 34.1 ± 4.4 mm) interventions demonstrated a significantly (p < 0.05) decreased vastus medialis thickness Additionally, the beef condition produced a significant (p < 0.05) increase in ferritin concentrations (117 ± 78.3 vs 150.5 ± 82.8 ng/mL). No such changes were observed for the whey (149.1 ± 92.1 vs 138.5 ± 77.7 ng/mL) and carbohydrate (149.0 ± 41.3 vs 150.0 ± 48.1 ng/mL) groups. Furthermore, ferritin changes in the beef group were higher than the modification observed in whey (p < 0.001) and carbohydrate (p = 0.025) groups. No differences were found between whey and carbohydrate conditions (p = 0.223). No further changes were observed.Conclusion: Ingesting a hydrolyzed beef protein beverage after workout or before breakfast (nontraining days) can be effective in preserving thigh muscle mass and in improving iron status in male master-age triathletes.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Kelly Cooper, Julia Stent, Carmen Dina Harmse, Alexandros Anagnostou, Carlo Poggiali, and Richard Jeffrey for their help and support during data collection.
Funding
Funding Crown Sports Nutrition and the University of Greenwich provided joint funding for completion of this project; however, this does not affect this original research content and purpose.
Author contributions
The study was designed by F.N. and E.L. Data were collected by M.S. and F.N. E.L., N.A., and F.N. analyzed the data. Interpretation and article preparation were undertaken by all authors. All authors approved the final version of the article.