Abstract
Treatment fidelity, including adherence and competence, is assessed during the implementation of evidence-based treatments to ensure that care is delivered as intended. Although fidelity monitoring is often resource-intensive, a relationship between fidelity and treatment outcomes has not been clearly demonstrated. Associations between observer-rated clinician fidelity and family treatment outcomes were investigated in a longitudinal sample of clinicians (n = 18) and parent-child dyads (n = 39) following a statewide implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy. Results indicated that neither adherence nor coaching competence predicted changes in treatment outcomes. Explanations for these findings, study limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
Acknowledgements
This study was part of a larger trial that was guided by a statewide steering committee and Shelley Hiegel, the project coordinator. We are grateful for their substantial contributions. This study also benefitted from feedback by Dr. Aaron Metzger and Dr. Claire St. Peter.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.