897
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining the impact of a gender-specific drug court on recidivism

&
Pages 206-221 | Received 25 May 2016, Accepted 30 Sep 2016, Published online: 26 Oct 2016
 

Abstract

Research into the effects of drug courts on recidivism has generally demonstrated positive results. These results have led to the expansion of the drug court model which focuses on causes or problems for specific populations, such as drunk drivers, mental health/dual diagnosis individuals, veterans, and others. While research has examined various adaptations to the drug court model, very few examinations have evaluated adaptations of the drug court model on female offenders. Characteristics of female offenders and their drug use have led some scholars to suggest that drug courts would be an appropriate intervention for this population. While past research has examined the role of gender in drug courts, this research occurs using samples from coed courts. The current study expands and adds to the literature on drug courts by evaluating a drug court designed just for female offenders. Female drug court participants are matched to a sample of probationers on multiple variables. Results indicate that a drug court for female offenders significantly lowers recidivism. Furthermore, the research examines and highlights the practical and methodological importance of measuring risk and examining treatment completion.

Notes

1. This can include women who have custody, have had custody removed, and women who have children who are adults (i.e., their children are over the age of 18).

2. There is a debate regarding whether or not different risk assessment tools should be used for female and male offender populations (for example, see Smith, Cullen, and Latessa Citation2009; Van Voorhis and Presser Citation2001). While there is a version of the COMPAS for women the Women’s Risk and Need Assessment (WRNA) (Van Van Voorhis et al. Citation2010), this tool was not being used by the drug court at the time of data collection.

3. There were no significant differences between low risk successful completers and moderate risk successful completers and their matched probation samples on new convictions.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 167.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.