406
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Legitimation in action: an examination of community courts and procedural justice

Pages 161-183 | Received 18 Aug 2017, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 12 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

We are at a critical moment in criminal justice reform as public distrust grows and threatens the legitimacy of the justice system. This is especially true for poor communities of color who have lower levels of trust because they have been disproportionately involved in the system, compared to their white counterparts. Community courts represent one way to restore trust and legitimacy in our criminal justice system. Although community courts are gaining popularity among policymakers, there has been little research about them. Using the theoretical framework of procedural justice, this study examines the way community courts attempt to achieve such reform. Observations, field notes, and interviews were taken over a three-month time period in three community courts: Midtown, Red Hook, and Newark. The findings illustrate the various ways judges in community courts practice and apply principles of procedural justice. Furthermore, this paper highlights findings that demonstrate how certain courtroom practices and procedures may be potentially problematic to procedural justice. Policy implications of this paper give advice on the ways community courts can strengthen their use of procedural justice in order to maintain legitimacy and trust in communities.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the three community courts observed in this study for opening their doors and granting me access. I would also like to thank RDCJN and Dr. Jacinta Gau for her assistance during the construction and development of this manuscript. Her insights and feedback are greatly appreciated.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. Resource coordinators are liaisons between the court and the social services. Their responsibility is to communicate to the judge and others the progress and compliance of the defendants.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Tyrell A. Connor

Tyrell A. Connor is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at the State University of New York. His research interest includes law and society, problem-solving courts, criminal justice reform practices and race.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 167.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.