236
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigation of activation mechanism and conformational stability of N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxybenzamide and N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxy-6-pentadecyl-benzamide in the: active site of p300 histone acetyl transferase enzyme by molecular dynamics and binding free energy studies

, &
Pages 4006-4018 | Received 19 Jul 2018, Accepted 22 Sep 2018, Published online: 13 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

The CBP (CREB-binding protein) and p300 are related to transcriptional coactivator family and are involved in several post-translational modifications, in which the acetylation is an important factor because it commences the transcription process. Experimental studies report that CTPB (N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxy-6-pentadecyl-benzamide) and CTB (N-(4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2-ethoxybenzamide) are good activators of p300 HAT enzyme, but yet, the molecular mechanism of their activation is not explored. The present study pertains to determine the intermolecular interactions, stability and binding free energy of CTB and CTPB from the molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and binding free energy calculation. The docking studies of the molecules reveal that the docking score of CTPB (−15.64 kcal/mol) is higher than that of CTB (−12.30 kcal/mol); on the contrary, CTB forms a strong interaction with the key residues of catalytic site (Tyr1467 and Trp1436) compared with CTPB. The MD simulation shows the stability of both molecules in the active site of p300 and their interactions. Furthermore, both docking and MD simulation studies of CTB confirm that it forms expected key interactions and retain the interactions with the active site amino acid residues of p300 when compared with CTPB. For this reason, the CTB recruits more acetyl-CoA in the active site of p300 compared with CTPB; it leads to activate the acetylation process; hence, CTB may be a best activator than CTPB. The binding free energy value of CTPB (−24.79 ± 2.38 kcal/mol) is higher when compared with that of CTB (−12.14 ± 1.30 kcal/mol) molecule; perhaps, the interaction of pentadecyl chain of CTPB with p300, whereas in CTB, such a group is absent.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Schrödinger, Bangalore, India, for allowing us to use the software for the docking study and C-DAC Bangalore for providing the GARUDA, supercomputing facility.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,074.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.