Direct effects of low-energy electrons on including sulfur bonds in proteins: a second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation (MP2) theory approach

Abstract

In an attempt to describe how low-energy electrons (LEEs) damage the polypeptide chain at disulfide bridges, ab initio electronic structure estimates on LEE interactions with cysteine-cysteine (Cys-Cys) disulfide bond model have been performed. Here, the fundamental mechanisms in LEE impression on S-S and C-S bond ruptures in the Cys-Cys model have been discussed. The electronic energy was calculated using the MP2 method with a Hartree–Fock exchange during the SCF and the Møller–Plesset correlation energy correction on the converged HF orbitals with 6-311++G(d,p) atomic orbital basis set. Further, six more sets of diffuse s and p functions with extra basis on the sulfur and relevant carbon atoms were used to describe the added electron to located away as much as possible from the nuclei in anions. The bonds rupture mechanisms involve the primary placement of LEEs to the π* orbital of the model to construct the shape-resonance state following by an adiabatic or nonadiabatic electron migration to either S-S or C-S bond σ* orbital. The formed radical anion undergoes S-S or C-S bonds cleavage by energy barriers of ca. 5.68 and 9.19 kcal/mol, respectively, to produce either (2-amino-2-carboxyethyl) sulfanyl (cysteine radical), aziridine-2-carboxylic acid or mercapto-L-cysteine lesions. In SMD solvent, calculations suggest electronically stable of the formed π* and σ* states by solvation, something that induces either S-S or C-S bond break even when the electron energy is near zero. The required barrier energy of only 0 to < 0.4 eV indicates a high kinetic favorable fragmentation for involved sulfur polypeptides with LEEs.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Keywords:

• Low-energy electron
• Cys-Cys model
• disulfide bridges
• MP2 approach

Acknowledgments

We thank the Inorganic Research Lab. 2 and Computational Lab. of the Razi University of Kermanshah.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.