The Implications of Objectification Theory for Women's Health: Menstrual Suppression and “Maternal Request” Cesarean Delivery

Abstract

Menstrual suppression with oral contraceptives and cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) are relatively new options for women and increasingly are available, particularly in developed countries, around the world. In this article, I explore these issues using objectification theory as a framework for deconstruction. I offer a provocative hypothesis: Women who objectify their bodies are not only interested in menstrual suppression, but also in surgicalized childbirth at their request. I argue that because patriarchal societies have aligned women's reproductive functions with nature, disinterest in menstruation and vaginal childbirth has become another way for women to separate themselves from their “earthly” nature and transform or maintain their bodies as idealized cultural symbols.

I acknowledge members of the Gender, Science, and Sexuality Working Group at the Women's Studies Research Center, Brandeis University, and, in particular, Christine Cooper, Bridgett Sheridan, and Mara Amster for providing constructive comments and ideas during the development of this article.

Notes

This can, of course, also apply to many men, depending on the power differential in race, class, and sexual orientation.