![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether criminal thinking underpins peer influence and selection. It was predicted that proactive criminal thinking would mediate the peer influence effect (peers → offending) and reactive criminal thinking would mediate the peer selection effect (offending → peers). Participants were 1,170 male delinquent youth from the Pathways to Desistance study. The Moral Disengagement scale (proactive criminal thinking) and Peer Delinquent Behavior scale (peer delinquency) were cross-lagged to predict criminal offending, and the Weinberger Impulse Control scale (reactive criminal thinking) and criminal offending were cross-lagged to predict peer delinquency. Consistent with predictions, proactive but not reactive criminal thinking successfully mediated the peer → offending relationship and reactive but not proactive criminal thinking successfully mediated the offending → peer relationship. Whereas delinquent peer associations appear to promote proactive criminal thinking and peer influence, early criminal offending appears to promote reactive criminal thinking and peer selection.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Glenn D. Walters
Glenn D. Walters, PhD, spent 27 years working as a clinical psychologist in the Federal Bureau of Prisons and for the past four years has been teaching courses in corrections, research methods, and drugs and crime in the Department of Criminal Justice department at Kutztown University in Kutztown, Pennsylvania. Dr Walters’ current research interests include development and validation of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS), mediation analysis, and creation of an overarching psychological theory of criminal behavior.