Abstract
Although researchers have examined whether dropping out of high school is related to crime, very few have studied college dropouts. It has been argued that dropping out of high school leads to minimal changes in crime since dropouts were already delinquent before leaving school. Among college dropouts, however, individuals who select into college are conceivably least delinquent; therefore, dropping out might indeed represent a negative life course transition. Against this backdrop, data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health are used to examine the relationship between dropping out of college and changes in crime between adolescence and young adulthood. Most broadly, results show that dropping out of college is positively related to crime across the life course. This association is also moderated by one’s propensity to complete college, whereby those most likely to attain a degree, but who ultimately drop out, exhibit the largest increases in crime.
Acknowledgements
This research uses data from Add Health, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris, and funded by a grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 17 other agencies. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Persons interested in obtaining Data Files from Add Health should contact Add Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, 206 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524 ([email protected]). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis. The author wishes to thank Editor Krohn, the anonymous reviewers, Jessica Finkeldey, Lauren Porter, and Ray Swisher for their thoughtful suggestions on earlier drafts. Direct correspondence to Christopher R. Dennison, Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: [email protected].
Notes
1 Given that respondents range from being in 7th to 12th grade at Wave I, it is possible that the selection-related measures will matter differently for younger and older respondents, respectively. To account for this potential variation, the estimation of propensity scores includes interaction terms between age (and age2) and all selection-related controls. The overall patterns of results are consistent when propensity scores are estimated without these interaction terms.
2 Respondents in the “future” group are, on average, younger than those who have already dropped out of school. To ensure that this age difference was not affecting the results, I conducted sensitivity analyses where I restricted “future” dropouts to older ages that were closer to those who have already dropped out. The results from these analyses were consistent with those presented here.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Christopher R. Dennison
Christopher R. Dennison is an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University at Buffalo, SUNY. His research examines how individuals' postsecondary educational attainments influence crime and well-being across the life course. Other research examines the socioeconomic consequences associated with criminal justice system contact.