Publication Cover
Chronobiology International
The Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research
Volume 38, 2021 - Issue 2
300
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Gender difference in circadian clock responses for social interaction with conspecific of the opposite-sex

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 212-223 | Received 09 Jun 2020, Accepted 26 Oct 2020, Published online: 12 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Social cues are potent non-photic modulators of the circadian clock and play a vital role in resetting the endogenous clock. Several lines of evidence strongly suggest a functional link between olfactory cues and the circadian clock. However, there is a paucity of information on the effects of social interaction with the conspecifics of the opposite sex on the circadian clock. Hence, we studied the effect of social cues of sexually mature naïve opposite sex of the conspecific on the phase resetting of the circadian clock at various circadian times (CT) and molecular changes at the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) and odor responsive structure in the brain of mice. Sexually naïve adult male and female free-running mice (designated as ‘runners’) were exposed to the conspecifics of the opposite-sex (‘strangers’) for 30 min at CT3, CT9, CT15, and CT21. Both male and female ‘runners’ exhibited a phase advance at CT3, delay at CT21, and no response at CT9. However, at CT15 only the male ‘runners’ exhibited phase advance but not the female ‘runners’. Control mice did not elicit any significant phase shifts at all CTs. Social interactions with conspecifics of the opposite-sex up-regulated c-fos/C-FOS, omp in the olfactory bulb, per-1/PER-1 in the SCN, C-FOS, and PER-1 in the piriform cortex of both male and female runners at CT3. However, at CT15 up-regulation of variables only occurred in male but not in female runners. Together, the present investigation has shown the gender difference in circadian clock responses for social cues with conspecific of the opposite-sex in mice.

Acknowledgements

Financial support by DST (SR/CSI/157/2012), UGC-ISF (No.6-2/2017/IC) to MS is gratefully acknowledged. UGC-RGNF JRF & SRF Fellowship grant to PS and Departmental facilities of UGC-CAS & DST-FIST, and ISLS, BHU are acknowledged. Dr. P. Basu is gratefully acknowledged for critically reading the manuscript and providing language help.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical ion

The Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of the Banaras Hindu University approved the experimental protocols (BHU/DOZ/IAEC/2018-2019/026).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi [SR/CSI/157/2012]; University Grants Commission, New Delhi [No.6-2/2017/IC].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 489.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.