1,320
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Reports

Assessing food security through cooking and food literacy among students enrolled in a basic food science lab at Appalachian State University

, MS, RDN, , MS, RDN, LDN, , PhD, RDNORCID Icon & , PhD, RDN, LDN
Pages 30-35 | Received 10 Jun 2020, Accepted 15 Jan 2021, Published online: 12 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

A dual relationship between food insecurity and inadequate food literacy among college students may be attributed to limited food literacy, availability and ability to prepare healthful foods. Experiences that increase food literacy can improve diet quality and reduce food insecurity. Research was conducted through a food literacy-based curriculum developed using Social Cognitive Theory and Experiential Learning Theory. Food literacy outcomes and food security level were measured pre- and post-term through a Qualtrics-based survey. Analyses included Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and McNemar test. Analysis was completed on participants who completed both the pre and post surveys (n = 39). Over 30% of participants identified as food insecure. Results showed an increase in food literacy-based behaviors, self-efficacy and confidence (p<.05) in several measurements. Food security did not significantly improve; however, a positive trend toward food secure habits was observed. Food literacy-based self-efficacy and behaviors improved, which increases the potential for engagement and adaptation of related behaviors. Improvements observed may provide positive coping skills to reduce food insecurity. Incorporating a Basic Foods Lab into the General Education, Wellness Literacy curriculum can increase food literacy skills that may translate into reduced food insecurity.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States and received approval from the Appalachian State University IRB.

Funding

No funding was used to support this research and/or the preparation of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.