Headgear safety attitudes among women’s lacrosse stakeholders: Qualitative results

Abstract

Objective

To explore diverse stakeholders’ perceptions of headgear use in collegiate women’s lacrosse.

Participants

189 collegiate women’s lacrosse stakeholders (players: n = 87; coaches: n = 71; officials: n = 32).

Methods

Participants completed online open-ended qualitative questions surrounding headgear use in the sport. Responses were coded by the research team via inductive reasoning.

Results

Stakeholders felt that incorporating headgear use into women’s lacrosse would increase aggression and change the nature of the sport. Some felt that headgear was important for injury risk mitigation and invoked a need for research and development. Stakeholders raised the need for coaching and officiating improvement as primary injury prevention measures. Players were concerned about esthetics and performance limitations. Finally, many felt that it should be left to player choice to wear headgear or not.

Conclusion

Most stakeholders invoke concerns of risk compensation and changing the nature of the sport of women’s lacrosse, and are in favor of headgear remaining optional.

Keywords:

• Behaviors
• concussion
• helmets
• perception
• risk compensation

Additional information

Funding

No funding was used to support this research and/or the preparation of the manuscript.