Bereaved families and the coronial response to traumatic workplace fatalities: Organizational perspectives

ABSTRACT

Work remains a significant source of illness, injury, and death in developed countries. In Australia, for example, over 2,000 people die from work-related causes each year, with heavy social, economic, and personal costs (Safe Work Australia, 2013a). Most die as a result of work-related disease. However, many die from trauma. In 2012, 223 workers were fatally injured in Australia and in the United States the figure was 4,383 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014; Safe Work Australia, 2013b). Apart from the immediate tragedy of each worker’s death, these deaths affect the victim’s immediate family, wider family, friends, and co-workers. It has been estimated that, on average, every death has an impact on at least 20 other people (Dyregrov, Nordanger, & Dyregrov, 2003), especially when the deceased had several families, which is an increasingly common phenomenon (OECD, 2014). Little is known, however, about how regulatory responses following a traumatic workplace fatality meet the needs of surviving families. With a focus on the coronial investigation, this article provides information about the regulatory responses to a traumatic workplace fatality and examines how various organizations involved in the coronial process following the death viewed its ability to accommodate the needs and wishes of surviving families.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Cath Finney Lamb for her assistance with the data analysis for this project.

Notes

¹In most workplaces this will be the regulator responsible for enforcing occupational health and safety (OHS) legislation though in some states there is separate legislation governing mines and off-shore oil rigs administered by a separate inspectorate. In road, maritime and air transport there are also separate regulatory agencies.