482
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Revising ruling discourses: The griefwork evidence-to-practice gap and the mental health workforce

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1136-1145 | Published online: 25 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’ pioneering work focused on dying, yet some clinicians persist in prescribing it as a path through grief. We surveyed 964 mental health clinicians who completed a five-section mixed methods survey: two sections assessed knowledge with multiple choice questions and a case study to assess clinicians’ knowledge-base and approach to grief/loss in practice. Analysis of four items related to Kübler-Ross’ model and 66/962 case studies indicates ongoing use of “stages” and Kübler-Ross’ model. Only 330 (34.2%) of the clinicians were deemed knowledgeable; 462 (47.9%) were questionable; and 172 (17.9%) were misinformed, continuing to use Kübler-Ross’ stage theory for grief.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the time taken by the respondents to reflectively answer our survey. We also are grateful for the Grounded Research in Practice project of the Rutgers School of Social Work that selected this project for in-kind support and provided the email listserv for the survey distribution. We also acknowledge Jeanne Koller’s contributions to the preparation of this project.

Ethics statement

The research was ethically reviewed by the university IRB, following the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All respondents indicated understanding of the informed consent prior to completion of the survey.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 It should be noted that we do not reject Kübler-Ross’ analysis altogether. As noted, her research was done with people who were terminally ill and was, per her title, about “what the dying have to teach.” Her stages likely reflect a trajectory for many who are dying, but they do not reflect an empirically grounded progression or set of stages for those who are grieving a loss, whether a death or other type of loss (job, relationship, status, etc.). We also have seen the harm to grievers who believe this is a prescription for how to do grief well. See Corr (Citation2020) for further explication.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 246.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.