Abstract
Innovation policy is in need of a rationale which allows for the design and evaluation of policy instruments. In economic policy, focus has traditionally been placed on market failures, and efficiency measures have been used to decide whether policy should intervene and which instrument should be applied. In innovation policy, this rationale cannot be meaningfully applied because of the uncertain and open character of innovation processes. Uncertainty is not a market failure and cannot be repaired. Inevitably, policy makers are subject to failure and their goals cannot pragmatically be represented by a social optimum. In eschewing the concept of ‘optimal innovation’, avoiding evolutionary inefficiencies becomes central to analysis and to innovation policy making. Superimposed on the several sources of evolutionary inefficiencies are so-called ‘network inefficiencies’. Because of the widespread organization of innovation into innovation networks, network structures and dynamics give useful hints for where and when innovation policy should intervene.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges funding through the ServPPIN project: The Contribution of Public and Private Services to European Growth and Welfare, and the Role of Public–Private Innovation Networks, Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities Programme of the European Union’s 7th Framework.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.