879
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Non-genetic risk factors for keratoconus

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 362-372 | Received 01 Feb 2022, Accepted 29 Mar 2022, Published online: 03 May 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Keratoconus is a complex and multifactorial disease and its exact aetiology remains unknown. This current study examined the important environmental risk factors and their association with keratoconus. This study was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of systematic reviews under registration number CRD42021256792 in 2021. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for all relevant articles published from 1 January 1900 to 31 July 2021. National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The assessment for statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Z-statistics on RevMan v5.4. P-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant and I2 < 25% as homogenous. Thirty studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratio was calculated with 95% CI. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of eye rubbing, atopy, asthma, and eczema was 3.64 (95% CI, 2.02, 6.57), 1.90 (95% CI, 1.22, 2.94), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.61) and 1.90 (95% CI, 1.22, 2.94), respectively. The OR for diabetes was 0.86 (95% CI 0.73, 1.02), and use of sunglasses, contact lens, allergic conjunctivitis, side sleep position and prone sleep position was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.16, 0.99), 1.68 (0.70, 4.00), 2.24 (95% CI, 0.68, 7.36), 3.81 (95% CI, 0.31, 46.23), 12.76 (95% CI, 0.27, 598.58), respectively. Twenty studies were considered to be of high quality, nine to be moderate and one to be low. Environmental risk factors have been identified to play a role in the susceptibility of keratoconus. However, further large-scale longitudinal studies are needed to understand the mechanisms between environmental risk factors and keratoconus.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project Ideas grant APP1187763 and Senior Research Fellowship (1138585 to PNB), Lions Eye Donation Service (SS), Angior Family Foundation (SS) and Perpetual Impact Philanthropy grant (SS). The Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government. The sponsor or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Purchase Issue

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 84.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.