119
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Do Biometric Readings Change Significantly over Time in Phakic Eyes? A Cohort Study

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 343-347 | Received 04 Aug 2019, Accepted 06 Dec 2020, Published online: 28 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Precise biometric assessment is crucial in achieving desirable refractive outcomes following cataract surgery. The current evidence for longitudinal biometric changes is lacking. We have performed a cohort study of phakic patients undergoing cataract surgery to help demonstrate whether biometric parameters change over time.

Methods: We performed a single-centre, historic cohort study of patients who attended a “two-stop” pre-assessment clinic for consideration of cataract surgery between November 2002 and March 2015. Data were collected retrospectively. Four biometric measurements were recorded: axial length, horizontal (K1) readings, vertical (K2) readings and dioptric power of lens (AR40). Patients were allocated to three groups according to the time interval between initial and latest biometric assessment: Group 1: up to 12 months; Group 2: 12–24 months; Group 3: over 24 months.

Results: Data were obtained for 109 eyes from 62 patients. Mean patient age at first biometry was 78 (range: 49–95; S.D.:10). Thirty-eight patients (61.3%) were female. Paired t-tests were performed per biometric measurement per group. No statistically significant changes were observed in Group 1 (n = 9). In Group 2, a statistically significant change was observed in K1 readings (median change: −0.12 mm, range: −0.65 mm to 0.64 mm; P = .002). In Group 3, statistically significant changes were observed in K1 readings (median change: 0.06 mm, range: −0.59 mm to 1.29 mm, P = .03), K2 readings: (median change: 0.33 mm, range: −0.50 mm to 1.09 mm, P < .001) and no change in AR40 readings (median change: 0.00, range −2.00 to 3.00, P = .02).

Conclusion: Statistically significant biometric changes were observed over time in this cohort. We recommend considering repeat biometric assessment in patients who have had an interval of longer than 24 months between initial biometric assessment and surgery for optimal refractive outcomes. Further research is required to identify more precisely when to expect changes in the various biometric parameters and which patient characteristics may contribute.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Agnes Arthur-Netty and Margaret Theaker for assistance with data collection. Dr Rufai was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Fellowship. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 530.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.